Academic Publishing and its Digital Binds: Beyond the Paywall towards Ethical Executions of Code

Abstract

In this article we explore various constraints and potentials of academic publishing in the digital age. Advancement of digital platforms and their expansive reach amplify the underlying tensions of institutional and scholarly change. A key affordance of these platforms is that of speed: rapidly distributing the outputs of a precaritised profession and responding to pressures to publish as well as the profit motive of publishers. On the one hand, these systems make possible alternative modes of contributory content and peer-production for supporting the commons. On the other, they turn all too readily into privatising devices for contracting labour and profit in the corporate sector and, within the academy, for accentuating subtle power effects. Drawing upon platform studies and integrating insights from political philosophy and property law, our article seeks to problematise neat binaries of possession and dispossession associated with the sector. We examine in particular how co-existing and emergent socio-technical circuits-what we term digital binds-modulate the political economy of academic publishing on a number of scales. These entangled binds constrain but also indicate mechanisms for opening up new possibilities. We introduce three ethical executions of code towards this end: dissuading, detouring, and disrupting. Together, these mechanisms show how mutually beneficial boundaries can be drawn for designing otherwise: by blocking dominant systems and bargaining for fairer practices; exploring sanctioned and unsanctioned systems which offer more diverse publishing pathways; and, disrupting systemic processes and profits towards more inclusive and equitable conditions.

Crop climate suitability mapping on the cloud: a geovisualization application for sustainable agriculture

“…Our product uses an approach popularized by digital media, whereas until now academic journals have been the dominant platform for communication in geospatial science. This has meant that a large proportion of map-based geographic science has been delivered at the scale of a printable page, at irregular intervals, and often behind paywall, which has severely limited access in the Global South and those without affiliation to research institutions 74 . Even with access to published map products there are issues with communicating fine spatial resolution imagery, as scaling a figure down for print on standard letter-size paper can result in data loss from resampling.…”

Publish-and-Flourish: Using Blockchain Platform to Enable Cooperative Scholarly Communication

“…Blockchain is a disruptive solution for scholarly communication that "can potentially transform the current socio-technical stasis of moral and market crises associated with academic publishing" [92]. The current scientific publishing system relies on trusted third parties (journals, editorial boards, editors) that provide interactions between authors and reviewers, and there are conflicting incentives and lack of trust among participants.…”

Technology Intervention: Rethinking the Role of Education and Faculty in the Transformative Digital Environment

“…Academics have traditionally circulated their research through peer-reviewed journals but technology is opening up many new paths to publication and dissemination. Swist and Magee (2017) explored the constraints and potentials for academic publishing in the digital age. They discussed how the advancement of digital platforms amplifies the underlying tensions of institutional and scholarly change (Swist & Magee, 2017).…”

“…Swist and Magee (2017) explored the constraints and potentials for academic publishing in the digital age. They discussed how the advancement of digital platforms amplifies the underlying tensions of institutional and scholarly change (Swist & Magee, 2017). This section will present some of the trends that are underway that have affected our research dissemination.…”