2005
DOI: 10.1080/00313830500267838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Self‐concept, Implicit Theories of Ability, and Self‐regulation Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
84
2
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
84
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…They have also been shown to be associated with other constructs including academic motivation (Ommundsen et al 2005), cognitive engagement (Dupeyrat and Mariné 2005), learning and achievement goals (Blackwell et al 2007;Dinger and Dickhäuser 2013), epistemic beliefs and goal orientations (Chen and Pajares 2010), selfefficacy (Chen and Pajares 2010;Davis et al 2011), and self-regulated learning (Burnette et al 2013;Greene et al 2010). While clearly an important framework, an alternative position on implicit theories exists with respect to the 'prototypical' nature of intelligence.…”
Section: Implicit Theories Of the Prototypical Nature Of Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have also been shown to be associated with other constructs including academic motivation (Ommundsen et al 2005), cognitive engagement (Dupeyrat and Mariné 2005), learning and achievement goals (Blackwell et al 2007;Dinger and Dickhäuser 2013), epistemic beliefs and goal orientations (Chen and Pajares 2010), selfefficacy (Chen and Pajares 2010;Davis et al 2011), and self-regulated learning (Burnette et al 2013;Greene et al 2010). While clearly an important framework, an alternative position on implicit theories exists with respect to the 'prototypical' nature of intelligence.…”
Section: Implicit Theories Of the Prototypical Nature Of Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of studies about implicit theories of students; however, their focus is on students' beliefs regarding their intellectual ability and the role that such beliefs play in students' academic achievements and classroom behaviour (Doron, Stephan, Boiche, & Le Scanff, 2009;Dweck, Chiu, & Hong, 1995;Gonida, Kiosseoglou &Leondari, 2006;Molden & Dweck, 2000;Ommundsen, Haugen & Lund, 2005). Little if any research has examined university students' beliefs regarding their English language competencies and their significance for academic learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most, of the previous researches examining the inter-correlations or inter-effects of the above concepts have focused on mathematics or/and language, while other school subjects have almost ignored, although features of the task affect learners' beliefs and, subsequent application, about skills and strategies are required, and competence and control beliefs (see Cromley & Azevedo, 2011;Efklides, 2014;Kurman, 2001;Ommundsen, Haugen, & Lund, 2005;Pressley & Gaskins, 2006;Schunk & Zimmerman, 2006;Wang & Holcombe, 2010). This study focuses on language, mathematics and physical education.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%