Academic success, language and the four year degree: A case study of a 2007 cohort

Abstract

Tension exists between broadening access to tertiary education and ensuring throughput; as simply enrolling underprepared students into three-year degree programmes can be counterproductive, leading to failure and an increased dropout rate. Thus, correct placement of students and effective teaching interventions are crucial. On this basis, the University of Johannesburg implemented a four year BSc degree. Typical of many extended degree interventions, the first year was offered over a two year period, with an intensive teaching programme designed to reinforce and promote academic literacy skills. This case study tracked a cohort of such students. The class was multi-racial, multi-ethnic and mixed gender. In the main, students had poor school results and weak language abilities. Using the Placement Test in English for Educational Purposes' (PTEEP) test as a pre and post intervention test, demonstrated that the academic intervention improved the academic literacy levels of all the students, but students hailing from poor, disadvantaged schools, who wrote English as a Second Language for matric, benefitted the most. From a gender perspective, black female students gained the most from the intervention. Still, in general, the higher the original (PTEEP) score, the more likely the student was to succeed. Students who attended well-resourced schools and wrote English First Language for matric generally obtained high PTEEP scores. In terms of graduation rates, a four year degree, combined with an intervention such as described here, can increase epistemological access to the Sciences. Importantly, success was nuanced, as there were still drop outs and academic exclusions. Not all were able to graduate within four years and some had to change to other degree programmes.

Student factors affecting academic success among undergraduate students at two South African higher education institutions

“…We need resources so that we don't have to wish to send our children to formerly White-only schools'. The under-preparedness of learners from poorly resourced public schools -the majority of whom are Black, given racialised apartheid-era schooling and socio-economic disparities -for higher education is well-documented (e.g., Mavunga, 2014;McKay, 2016). Evidently, South Africa's long-standing structural inequalities continue to disadvantage particularly Black students from low socio-economic backgrounds at various stages of their academic careers.…”

The Academentia of ECAs: Navigating Academic Terrain Through Critical Friendships as a Life Jacket

“…Van der Merwe (2018), comparing the acquisition of core academic language skills of a cross section of teacher education students, concluded that support in Year 1 only had limited effects. And, in an extended degree programme, McKay (2016), who used a structured academic literacy module in the first year, showed that although the most disadvantaged students did benefit from the intervention, this did not translate into academic success in the long term. In that study, almost 42% of the students were either academically excluded or switched qualifications.…”