2012
DOI: 10.3998/mpub.2173936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Writing for Graduate Students, 3rd Edition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
152
0
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
152
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…(Erkenntnis, 79) I think he would have been quite pleased with the idea that at some point I would be doing this now. (The Sociological Review,61) Hyland (2012) suggested that this tendency reflects the contents of textbooks by Day (2006) and Swales & Feak (2004) that scientists are encouraged to make their own voice clear by the use of personal attribution in science papers.…”
Section: Subjectivity and Objectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Erkenntnis, 79) I think he would have been quite pleased with the idea that at some point I would be doing this now. (The Sociological Review,61) Hyland (2012) suggested that this tendency reflects the contents of textbooks by Day (2006) and Swales & Feak (2004) that scientists are encouraged to make their own voice clear by the use of personal attribution in science papers.…”
Section: Subjectivity and Objectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students are often referred to as a group of scholars and intellectuals who hold a heavy burden on the shoulders of determining the fate of the nation's future (Ishaq, 2006). Students with higher capacity are expected to understand the concept, can be mapped the problem and choosing the best solution for these problems (Dweck, 2007;Swales & Feak, 2004). However, various problems may arise during the implementation of a student in academic activities, the number of activities to be undertaken and implemented, many demands which must be met, which not good time management, and project work are piling up (Collier & Morgan, 2008;Graunke & Woosley, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic moves (Bhatia 1993), the variations to the IMRD (Introduction, Methodology, Results, Discussion) model (Dos Santos 1996, Hyland 2000, the different types of abstracts (Swales/Feak 1994, Lorés-Sanz 2004, the use of metadiscourse (Hyland 2005) are some of our working notions. Section 3 turns to data analysis from two perspectives: on the one hand, we compare the generic structure of English and French criminology abstracts; on the other hand, we consider the use of frame markers in representing the structure of the abstracted article and the mentions to author's identity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%