Accelerated Canine Retraction by Corticotomy Assisted or Periodontal Distraction

Yousif, Atia Abdelwareth Abdelrazik; Abo-Taha, Neveen F.; Essa, Emad

doi:10.21608/edj.2019.73998

Cited by 2 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The characteristics of the six included trials [ 16 , 34 - 38 ] are illustrated in Table 3 and Table 4 . Only two trial protocols were found; more information about those ongoing research projects is given in Table 5 and Table 6 .…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six completed RCTs [ 16 , 34 - 38 ], with a total of 152 patients, with ages ranging from 15 to 25 years, were included in this SR. One study included only female patients [ 36 ], three studies did not give information about sex distribution [ 16 , 34 , 35 ], while the other two studies included both genders, with a predominance of females [ 37 , 38 ]. Four of the involved studies were of a compound design (COMP) [a parallel-group design with a split-mouth design (SMD) in each group] [ 16 , 34 , 35 , 38 ], and the others were of SMD [ 36 , 37 ]. Three studies touched on the multiplicity of acceleration methods.…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In one paper, the authors evaluated LLLT + MOPs versus each of these techniques separately [ 34 ], whereas, in the other study, only the comparison between LLLT + corticotomy versus corticotomy was performed [ 36 ]. Moreover, the third study combined multiple osteoperforation with a corticotomy procedure against multiple osteoperforation only [ 16 ]. On the other hand, the other three studies [ 35 , 37 , 38 ] discussed the efficacy of repeating the acceleration procedures.…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All three papers dealt with the repetition of MOPs at different time intervals. The surgical interventions in the retrieved studies ranged from invasive (traditional corticotomy [ 16 , 36 ], multiple osteoperforation with flap elevation [ 16 ]) to minimally invasive (MOPs [ 34 , 35 , 37 , 38 ]).…”

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The surgical procedures are considered the most clinically effective methods, and they have been rigorously tested several times in terms of the possibility of significantly decreasing treatment duration [ 3 ]. However, the surgical intervention includes various procedures such as conventional corticotomy [ 5 , 14 ], dentoalveolar distraction [ 15 ], periodontal distraction [ 16 ], interseptal alveolar surgery [ 17 ], accelerated osteogenic orthodontics [ 18 ], piezocision [ 2 , 19 ], corticision [ 20 ], and micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) [ 21 ]. All these procedures depend on the same principle, "regional acceleratory phenomenon" (RAP), which was first described by Forest and is based on the principle that the occurrence of surgical injury to the alveolar bone may temporarily speed up OTM [ 22 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Effectiveness of Repetition or Multiplicity of Different Surgical and Non-Surgical Procedures Compared to a Single Procedure Application in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alfailany¹,

Hajeer²,

Aljabban³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, we aimed to assess the current scientific evidence concerning the effectiveness of combining two acceleration techniques or repeating an acceleration procedure in comparison with the single application in terms of the speed of the orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). We performed a comprehensive electronic search to retrieve relevant studies on 10 databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on fixed orthodontic treatment patients who received multiple types of acceleration techniques or underwent a repeated acceleration procedure compared to a single application were included. Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was used for assessing the risk of bias of retrieved studies. A total of six RCTs were included in this review. Regarding multiple acceleration methods, it seems that the combination of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) with a surgical technique outperforms the single application of each technique separately. Additionally, the combination of two surgical interventions may have a synergistic effect leading to reduced treatment time compared to the application of a single intervention. Regarding acceleration method repetition, it seems that the re-application of surgical procedures twice is more efficient than the single application. The meta-analysis showed a non-significant difference in the canine retraction rate between the four-weekly micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) (three times of applications) and both the eight-weekly MOPs (two times of applications) [mean difference (MD) = 0.24; 95% CI: -0.2-0.77; p = 0.36], as well as 12-weekly MOPs (two times of applications) (MD = 0.06; 95% CI: -0.14-0.27; p = 0.55). Based on very low evidence, combining two acceleration techniques is superior over a single application in accelerating tooth movement. Again, very low evidence suggests that the efficacy of repetition of surgical procedures twice and three times is similar. Further high-quality RCTs are required to assess the benefit of repeating an acceleration procedure or combining two different methods. In addition, more insight is needed into the possible side effects associated with the repetition or multiplicity of procedures.

show abstract

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Effectiveness of Repetition or Multiplicity of Different Surgical and Non-Surgical Procedures Compared to a Single Procedure Application in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Alfailany¹,

Hajeer²,

Aljabban³

et al. 2022

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Assessment of Orthodontic Canine Retraction via Two Approaches of Periodontal Distraction: A Comparative Clinical Study

El-Hendawey

Hussein

Hssan

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background This study aimed to assess and compare two approaches of periodontal distraction during orthodontic canine retraction. Methods A consecutive sample of 27 patients (54 canines) requiring extraction of upper 4s and canine retraction were grouped into three groups; canine retraction by using buccal periodontal distractor with distal interseptal bone cuts (group I), canine retraction by using buccal periodontal distractor without distal interseptal bone cuts (group II), conventional canine retraction on miniscrew (group III). The patients were evaluated before (T0) and after canine retraction (T1) for rate of canine retraction directly in patient’s mouth and at 1st ,2nd ,4th and 7th days after activation for pain sensation through visual analog scale (VAS). Results Regarding the rate of canine retraction, statistical analysis revealed that there was a significant difference between 3 groups. A significantly higher value was recorded in group I, followed by group II, with the lowest value recorded in group III (P-value > 0.05). Regarding pain score, statistical analysis revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between group I and II (p < 0.05) but the values recorded in them was significantly higher than group III within 1st and 2nd days (p > 0.05) respectively. Within 4th and 7th days, there was statically significant difference between 3 groups with the highest pain value in group II, followed by group I, with the lowest value in group III (p > 0.05). Conclusions canine retraction movement was accelerated effectively by periodontal distraction technique either with or without distal interseptal bone cuts; the periodontal distraction with distal interseptal bone cuts was higher in rate of canine retraction and lower in pain sensation than the periodontal distraction without distal interseptal bone cuts.

show abstract

Accelerated Canine Retraction by Corticotomy Assisted or Periodontal Distraction

Cited by 2 publications

References 34 publications

The Effectiveness of Repetition or Multiplicity of Different Surgical and Non-Surgical Procedures Compared to a Single Procedure Application in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The Effectiveness of Repetition or Multiplicity of Different Surgical and Non-Surgical Procedures Compared to a Single Procedure Application in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Assessment of Orthodontic Canine Retraction via Two Approaches of Periodontal Distraction: A Comparative Clinical Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About