2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerated cathodic reaction in microbial corrosion of iron due to direct electron uptake by sulfate-reducing bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
211
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 421 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
6
211
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there is an increase in contradictory reports on both accelerating and inhibiting actions on the corrosion process of the same functional group of microorganisms, such as sulfate reducers (Enning et al, 2012;Venzlaff et al, 2013), iron reducers (AlAbbas et al, 2013) and methanogens (Uchiyama et al, 2010). These studies show a strong species specificity for either MIC or MICI, which indicates that there is an urgent need to focus on the mechanisms rather than on the presence of certain functional groups, which is common practice at the moment.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, there is an increase in contradictory reports on both accelerating and inhibiting actions on the corrosion process of the same functional group of microorganisms, such as sulfate reducers (Enning et al, 2012;Venzlaff et al, 2013), iron reducers (AlAbbas et al, 2013) and methanogens (Uchiyama et al, 2010). These studies show a strong species specificity for either MIC or MICI, which indicates that there is an urgent need to focus on the mechanisms rather than on the presence of certain functional groups, which is common practice at the moment.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, two different mechanisms of iron corrosion were described, that is, chemical MIC (CMIC) and electrical MIC (EMIC) (Enning et al, 2012;Enning and Garrelfs, 2013;Venzlaff et al, 2013). These two mechanisms differ in the source of electrons used by the SRB, which was shown to be species specific.…”
Section: Metal Corrosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More frequently, the stimulating effect of bacteria cells, in particular SRB, is interpreted as the result of acceleration of the cathodic reaction because of accumulation of micro organism vital activity products, primarily hydrogen sulfide [5,16]. However, the possibility of substantial change in the nature of electrochemical reactions [9] and electron transfer in the electrode processes [11] is sufficiently broadly discussed. Serious attention is paid to studies of biofilm formation processes based on micro organism colonies and their screening influence [10] or accumulation of corrosion stimulators near a corroding surface [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, studies deal with the effects of sulfate-reducing bacteria [6,9,11,12]. However, stimulation of the corrosion of metals, particularly steel, zinc, and galvanized steel [12,13] by other microorganisms (Esteria Coli, Proteus vulgaris, Pseudomonasaeruginosa, Brucella sp, Gallionella sp, Staphylococus aureus, Staphylococus epidermidis [7,13]) is considered as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation