Accelerated failure-time model with weighted least-squares estimation: application on survival of HIV positives

Abstract

Background Survival analysis is the most appropriate method of analysis for time-to-event data. The classical accelerated failure-time model is a more powerful and interpretable model than the Cox proportional hazards model, provided that model imposed distribution and homoscedasticity assumptions satisfied. However, most of the real data are heteroscedastic which violates the fundamental assumption and consequently, the statistical inference could be erroneous in accelerated failure-time modeling. The weighted least-squares estimation for the accelerated failure-time model is an efficient semi-parametric approach for time-to-event data without the homoscedasticity assumption, which is developed recently and not often utilized for real data analysis. Thus, this study was conducted to ascertain the better performance of the weighted least-squares estimation method over the classical methods. Methods We analyzed a REAL dataset on Antiretroviral Therapy patients we recently collected. We compared the results from classical methods of estimation for the accelerated failure-time model with the results revealed from the weighted least-squares estimation. Results We found that the data are heteroscedastic and indicated that the weighted least-square method should be used to analyze this data. The weighted least-squares estimation revealed more accurate, and efficient estimates of covariates effect since its confidence intervals were shorter and it identified more significant covariates. Accordingly, the survival of HIV positives was found to be significantly linked with age, weight, functional status, CD4 (Cluster of Differentiation agent 4 glycoproteins), and clinical stages. Conclusions The weighted least-squares estimation performed the best in providing more significant effects and precise estimates than the classical accelerated failure-time methods of estimation if data are heteroscedastic. Thus, we recommend future researchers should utilize weighted least-squares estimation rather than the classical methods when the homoscedasticity assumption is violated.

Loss Model of Climate Insurance Based on Effect of Growing Degree Days Index

“…Loss model based on growing degree days index (𝐿 𝐺𝐷𝐷 ) : The method used to estimate model parameters is the least squares method [16], [17] with the following parameters:…”

Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) and Weighted Least Square Estimation (WLSE) With Five Different Underlying Distributions: A Model Comparison to the Application of Cancer Survival Data Analysis

“…Although the Cox PH model is the most common approach for modeling of survival data [9], the accelerated failure time (AFT) model is a more powerful and interpretable model than the Cox PH model provided that the model imposed distribution and homoscedasticity assumption satisfied. It can describe the relationship between the probability of survival and the set of covariates [8]. In addition, the advantage of the parametric AFT approach is that the effect of covariates on survival can be described in absolute terms (e.g.…”

“…In the recent survival analysis study of Mustefa and Chen [8], the researchers had shown that Log-Normal AFT was the best fit shown by AIC. They also concluded that the data were heteroscedastic and indicated that the WLSE method should be used to analyze this data.…”

“…A valid inference can be obtained from the WLSE than the AFT methods when the homoscedasticity assumption is violated. The WLSE method is a semi-parametric approach to handle both homoscedastic and heteroscedastic data beyond the incorporation of censoring, which is developed recently and not often utilized for real data analysis [8].…”