Purpose: To perform a dosimetric comparison of 3 accelerated partial breast irradiation techniques: catheter-based brachytherapy (BT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and proton beam therapy (PBT). Patients and Methods: Twelve patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with SAVI (Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant) were selected in this study. The original BT plans were compared with optimum plans using IMRT and PBT for 34 Gy (RBE) with 1.1 RBE in 10 fractions using identical parameters for target and organs at risk. Results: Significant reduction in maximum dose to the ipsilateral breast was observed with PBT and IMRT (mean 108.58% [PBT] versus 107.78% [IMRT] versus 2194.43% [BT], P ¼ .001 for both PBT and IMRT compared to BT). The mean dose to the heart was 0%, 1.38%, and 3.85%, for PBT, IMRT, and BT, respectively (P , .001 and P ¼ .026). The chest wall mean dose was 10.07%, 14.65%, and 29.44% for PBT, IMRT, and BT, respectively (P ¼ .001 and .013 compared to BT). The PBT was superior in reducing the mean ipsilateral lung dose (mean 0.04% versus 2.13% versus 5.4%, P ¼ .025 and P , .001). There was no statistically significant difference in the maximum dose to the ipsilateral lung, chest wall, 3-mm skin rind or in the mean ipsilateral breast V 50% among the 3 techniques (P ¼ .168, .405, .067, and .780, respectively). PBT exhibited the greatest mean dose homogeneity index of 4.75 compared to 7.18 for IMRT (P ¼ .001) and 195.82 for BT (P , .001). All techniques resulted in similar dose conformality (P ¼ .143). Conclusion: This study confirms the dosimetric feasibility of PBT and IMRT to lower dose to organs at risk while still maintaining high target dose conformality. Though the results of this comparison are promising, continued clinical research is needed to better define the role of PBT and IMRT in the accelerated partial breast irradiation treatment of early-stage breast cancer.