2020
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abb020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating and Supersonic Density Fluctuations in Coronal Hole Plumes: Signature of Nascent Solar Winds

Abstract: Slow magnetoacoustic waves in a static background provide a seismological tool to probe the solar atmosphere in the analytic frame. By analyzing the spatiotemporal variation of the electron number density of plume structure in coronal holes above the limb for a given temperature, we find that the density perturbations accelerate with supersonic speeds in the distance range from 1.02 to 1.23 solar radii. We interpret them as slow magnetoacoustic waves propagating at about the sound speed with accelerating subso… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated mass flux is ≈1.2 × 10 12 g s −1 , which is lower than the mass flux from network jets derived from IRIS observations (Tian et al 2014), but higher than the rough estimates of mass flux from a polar plume and open structures at the periphery of an active region (Sakao et al 2007;Cho et al 2020). Therefore, the jetlet mass flux is roughly comparable to the mass-loss rate in the wind at solar minimum, but a smaller fraction (≈60%) of the solar-maximum wind (Wang 1998(Wang , 2020.…”
Section: Mass-loss Rate From Jetletscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The estimated mass flux is ≈1.2 × 10 12 g s −1 , which is lower than the mass flux from network jets derived from IRIS observations (Tian et al 2014), but higher than the rough estimates of mass flux from a polar plume and open structures at the periphery of an active region (Sakao et al 2007;Cho et al 2020). Therefore, the jetlet mass flux is roughly comparable to the mass-loss rate in the wind at solar minimum, but a smaller fraction (≈60%) of the solar-maximum wind (Wang 1998(Wang , 2020.…”
Section: Mass-loss Rate From Jetletscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The estimated mass flux is ≈1.2×10 12 g s −1 , which is lower than the mass flux from network jets derived from IRIS observations (Tian et al 2014), but higher than the rough estimates of mass flux from a polar plume and open structures at the periphery of an active region (Sakao et al 2007;Cho et al 2020). Therefore the jetlet mass flux is roughly comparable to the mass-loss rate in the wind at solar minimum, but a smaller fraction (≈ 60%) of the solarmaximum wind (Wang 1998(Wang , 2020.…”
Section: Mass Loss Rate From Jetletscontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…A similar technique has recently been successfully applied to the analysis of the mechanisms responsible for the excitation of kink oscillations of coronal loops, which is based on a special catalog of corresponding events [Zimovets et al, 2015]. A separate task is to determine inclination angles of jet axes with respect to the solar surface and their evolution during a solar cycle, which will significantly improve the reconstruction of the global geometry of the coronal magnetic field by the method proposed in [Fleishman et al, 2017].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%