2021
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating bioactive peptide discovery via mutual information-based meta-learning

Abstract: Recently, machine learning methods have been developed to identify various peptide bio-activities. However, due to the lack of experimentally validated peptides, machine learning methods cannot provide a sufficiently trained model, easily resulting in poor generalizability. Furthermore, there is no generic computational framework to predict the bioactivities of different peptides. Thus, a natural question is whether we can use limited samples to build an effective predictive model for different kinds of peptid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the predictive performance of iBitter-DRLF with existing methods, including iBitter-Fuse [ 18 ], MIMML [ 20 ], iBitter-SCM [ 17 ], and BERT4Bitter [ 19 ] to assess the effectiveness and utility of our method against its competitors. Independent test results for iBitter-DRLF and the existing methods are compared in Table 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compared the predictive performance of iBitter-DRLF with existing methods, including iBitter-Fuse [ 18 ], MIMML [ 20 ], iBitter-SCM [ 17 ], and BERT4Bitter [ 19 ] to assess the effectiveness and utility of our method against its competitors. Independent test results for iBitter-DRLF and the existing methods are compared in Table 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2021, BERT4Bitter [ 19 ] was proposed, which used natural language processing (NLP) heuristic signature coding methods to represent peptide sequences as feature descriptors, and it displayed better accuracy. While in 2022, He et al [ 20 ] proposed mutual information-based meta learning (MIMML) to discover the best feature combination for bitter peptides and attained an independent accuracy of 93.8%. Although great progress has been made in this field, there is still much room for improvement in the performance of machine learning-based bitter peptide identification models using sequences only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAMP is a novel deep learning method that has shown promise in assessing not only protein–peptide interaction probabilities, but also in identifying the peptide residues that underpin the interaction using convolutional networks and a self-attention mechanism 34 . Mutual Information Maximization Meta-Learning is another approach relying on meta-learning and information theory that optimizes peptide bioactivity 35 . In fact, the growing interest in computational therapeutic peptide screening may require us to regularly benchmark emerging methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors discovered that using ∼20% of data from each cell type to pre-train a meta-model and then adapt it to a specific cell type using the rest of the data benefited model performance. MIMML 165 is a newly proposed meta-learning framework for bioactive peptide function prediction. MIMML is based on the Prototypical Network, 168 which performs few-shot classification by measuring the distance from a query example to a few exemplars of each class.…”
Section: New Deep-learning Methods and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%