1996
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1996.40410.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating effects of nonviable Staphylococcus aureus, its cell wall, and cell wall peptidoglycan

Abstract: We have previously reported that local application of viable Staphylococcus aureus dramatically accelerates wound healing, but viable Staphylococcus epidermidis does not. Because the S. aureus effect occurred in the absence of infection and because the cell walls of the two bacterial species differ, we hypothesized that nonviable S. aureus, its cell wall, and its cell wall component(s) would accelerate healing. Nonviable S. aureus was prepared by chemical and physical means, and its cell wall and peptidoglycan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven strains of S. aureus demonstrated the accelerated wound‐healing effect, while S. epidermidis (three strains), S. hominis (one strain), and P. aeruginosa (two strains), did not. Subsequent studies found that that nonviable S. aureus 21 and purified S. aureus peptidoglycan 22 could also accelerate wound healing, and could overcome corticosteroid‐induced suppression 23 and also CY‐induced suppression 24 of incisional wound healing in rats. The only significant differences observed in experiment one after chitosan application was a reduction of the wound healing process in the presence of CY.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven strains of S. aureus demonstrated the accelerated wound‐healing effect, while S. epidermidis (three strains), S. hominis (one strain), and P. aeruginosa (two strains), did not. Subsequent studies found that that nonviable S. aureus 21 and purified S. aureus peptidoglycan 22 could also accelerate wound healing, and could overcome corticosteroid‐induced suppression 23 and also CY‐induced suppression 24 of incisional wound healing in rats. The only significant differences observed in experiment one after chitosan application was a reduction of the wound healing process in the presence of CY.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously reported that the increased neutrophil infiltration in SaPG-inoculated sponges is evident as early as 12 hours after subcutaneous implantation of the sponges in rats 23 and is present at 4 and 7 days postoperative. 4,23 Muramyl dipeptide and glucosamyl muramyl tripeptide, synthetic analogues of peptidoglycan components, are potent immunoadjuvants, 24,25 and peptidoglycan is mitogenic for B lymphocytes. 21 S. aureus peptidoglycan activates neutrophils27 and macrophages 28 and stimulates them to release interleukin-1, both in vitro and in vivo,22 and may induce the release (or increased synthesis) of growth-promoting cytokines (e .g ., synovial cells of streptococcal cell wall induced arthritis in rats secrete in vitro TGF-(329 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each wound was immediately inoculated along its entire length with 157 p1 saline solution or 157 pl saline solution containing 4.7 mg SaPG (860 mg SaPG/cm incision). The amount of SaPG used for inoculation of the sponges and incisions was based on our previously conducted dose-response experiments 12 and our earlier publications. [12][13][14][15] Oddnumbered rats received saline solution in the sponges and wounds on the left side and SaPG in the wounds and sponges on the right side, whereas even-numbered rats received the opposite regimen.…”
Section: Statistical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each incision was cut perpendicular to the axis of the wound and into seven strips of equal width (0 .67 cm) using a multiblade cutting device . The first, third, fifth, and sixth strip from each wound (starting at the cephalic end of the wound) were immediately tested for breaking strength using a tensiometer by a standard method in our laboratory ; [11][12][13][14][15]17,18 strip #4 was fixed in 10% buffered formalin for histologic and immunohistochemical evaluation . The upper and middle sponges from each side were removed with the immediately surrounding and penetrating reparative tissue capsule and placed in 6N HCl and hydrolyzed at 130°C for 3 hours prior to measurement of hydroxyproline (Hyp) by the Woessner method .…”
Section: Statistical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation