2022
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12123160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerating the Laboratory Testing Capacity through Saliva Pooling Prior to Direct RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

Abstract: The testing capacity of the laboratory is paramount for better control of the pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. The pooling method is promising to increase testing capacity, and the use of direct NAAT-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 on a non-invasive specimen such as saliva will ultimately accelerate the testing capacity. This study aims to validate the pooling-of-four method to quadruple the testing capacity using RNA-extraction-free saliva specimens. In addition, we intend to investigate the preferable stage of p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If negative pooling is detected, all samples in the pool are assumed to be below the test’s detection limit. In contrast, if positive pooling is detected, each specimen is required to undergo further individual evaluation 11 .The pooled screening strategy could be implemented most effectively in low prevalence settings with a 5–6% positivity rate of infection 12 14 . Numerous studies have demonstrated that the pooling testing method results in high agreement on positive specimen detection and a comparable cycle threshold (Ct) value between pooled and individual specimens, although an expected slight loss of sensitivity has been shown, particularly when individual specimens have a low viral load 15 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If negative pooling is detected, all samples in the pool are assumed to be below the test’s detection limit. In contrast, if positive pooling is detected, each specimen is required to undergo further individual evaluation 11 .The pooled screening strategy could be implemented most effectively in low prevalence settings with a 5–6% positivity rate of infection 12 14 . Numerous studies have demonstrated that the pooling testing method results in high agreement on positive specimen detection and a comparable cycle threshold (Ct) value between pooled and individual specimens, although an expected slight loss of sensitivity has been shown, particularly when individual specimens have a low viral load 15 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If negative pooling is detected, all samples in the pool are assumed to be below the test's detection limit. In contrast, if positive pooling is detected, each specimen is required to undergo further individual evaluation [12]. The pooled screening strategy could be implemented most effectively in low prevalence settings with a 5-6% positivity rate of infection [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%