2017 21st European Microelectronics and Packaging Conference (EMPC) &Amp; Exhibition 2017
DOI: 10.23919/empc.2017.8346881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration measurements during reactive bonding processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This shrinkage can be partly attributed to the filling of the cracks in the reactive foil layer (For some applications, the necessity to fill the cracks sets a lower limit for the thickness of the solder layer: if thinner solder layers are used, the cracks can either not be filled, which may lead to problems if e.g., a hermetic joint is required, or the remaining solder layer becomes too thin, which may lead to problems in case of components with high surface roughness and waviness.). However, the here observed shrinkage can mainly be attributed to the pronounced lateral outflow of liquid Sn out of the joining zone during the bonding step, driven by the application of the uniaxial pressure (also see [23]). Note that this practical issue prevents modelling of the actual time-temperature-profiles as e.g., performed in [11]: the observed lateral outflow of liquid solder leads to an undefined heat loss which makes correct modelling of the heat flow and of the corresponding time-temperature-profile impossible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This shrinkage can be partly attributed to the filling of the cracks in the reactive foil layer (For some applications, the necessity to fill the cracks sets a lower limit for the thickness of the solder layer: if thinner solder layers are used, the cracks can either not be filled, which may lead to problems if e.g., a hermetic joint is required, or the remaining solder layer becomes too thin, which may lead to problems in case of components with high surface roughness and waviness.). However, the here observed shrinkage can mainly be attributed to the pronounced lateral outflow of liquid Sn out of the joining zone during the bonding step, driven by the application of the uniaxial pressure (also see [23]). Note that this practical issue prevents modelling of the actual time-temperature-profiles as e.g., performed in [11]: the observed lateral outflow of liquid solder leads to an undefined heat loss which makes correct modelling of the heat flow and of the corresponding time-temperature-profile impossible.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This indicates that, during reactive joining, the Sn layers were likely not liquefied completely throughout the whole bonding area, thus preventing lateral outflow of liquid Sn under pressure. With a speed of the reaction front of approximately 8 m s −1 for the commercial Ni(V)-Al RFs used here (determined with a high-speed camera), the total reaction time from one side of the 4 mm × 4 mm bonding area to the other is only about 0.5 ms (also see [23]). Hence, in case of Cu, the solder layer was in the liquid state for less than 0.5 ms, which corresponds reasonably well to model predictions for a similar scenario [11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%