2021
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.1c03454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration Mechanisms of C–H Bond Functionalization Catalyzed by Electron-Deficient CpRh(III) Complexes

Abstract: A rhodium(III) complex bearing a 1,3-bis(ethoxycarbonyl)-substituted or an unsubstituted cyclopentadienyl ligand (Cp E or Cp) significantly accelerates a variety of oxidative C−H bond functionalization reactions. However, the driving force of the acceleration compared with a conventionally used Cp*Rh(III) complex has not been elucidated. Herein, we performed density functional theory (DFT) calculations of the rhodium(III)-catalyzed oxidative C−H bond olefination and annulation reactions using Cp*, Cp, and Cp E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, both the electron-deficient complex [Cp′RhCl 2 ] 2 (Cp′ = 1,3-(CO 2 Et) 2 -C 5 Me 3 ) reported by Tanaka 14 and the non-methylated complex [CpRhI 2 ] n , first introduced by our group, 15 effectively promoted the reaction with formation of 3aa in 90 and 96% yield (entries 5 and 6), respectively. The enhanced catalytic activity can be explained by higher electrophilicity of rhodium in these complexes, 16 which facilitates the ratedetermining CH activation step (for mechanism, see below). When the reaction temperature is decreased to 100 °C, the yield of 3aa drops dramatically to 10% for [Cp′RhCl 2 ] 2 , while for [CpRhI 2 ] n it still remains acceptable (50%).…”
Section: Paper Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, both the electron-deficient complex [Cp′RhCl 2 ] 2 (Cp′ = 1,3-(CO 2 Et) 2 -C 5 Me 3 ) reported by Tanaka 14 and the non-methylated complex [CpRhI 2 ] n , first introduced by our group, 15 effectively promoted the reaction with formation of 3aa in 90 and 96% yield (entries 5 and 6), respectively. The enhanced catalytic activity can be explained by higher electrophilicity of rhodium in these complexes, 16 which facilitates the ratedetermining CH activation step (for mechanism, see below). When the reaction temperature is decreased to 100 °C, the yield of 3aa drops dramatically to 10% for [Cp′RhCl 2 ] 2 , while for [CpRhI 2 ] n it still remains acceptable (50%).…”
Section: Paper Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). 34 When the Cp E Rh( iii ) complex is applied, the activation energies of both rate-determining CMD ( IM1 → IM2 , ΔΔ G ‡ = –4.6 kcal mol −1 ) and reductive elimination ( IM4′ → IM5 , ΔΔ G ‡ = –3.2 kcal mol −1 ) steps were found to be significantly lowered, compared to those when using the Cp*Rh( iii ) complex. In addition, the higher Lewis acidity of the Cp E Rh( iii ) complex facilitated the smooth ligand exchange and the successive alkyne insertion, with only 16.0 kcal mol −1 ( IM2 → TS2 ) in total, while the Cp*Rh( iii ) complex required higher energy (21.4 kcal mol −1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, we found earlier that the use of an unsubstituted complex [CpRhI 2 ] n leads to a dramatic change in the selectivity of annulation of benzoic acids with internal alkynes, shifting the reaction pathway toward the formation of naphthalenes instead of isocoumarins . Recently, Nagashima and Tanaka have shown by calculation that the presence of an electron-withdrawing COOEt group in the Cp ring can decrease the activation barriers for the C–H bond activation step …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%