2013
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/102/49001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration of solar wind ions to 1 MeV by electromagnetic structures upstream of the Earth's bow shock

Abstract: PACS 95.30.Qd -Magnetohydrodynamics and plasmas PACS 47.35.Fg -Solitary waves PACS 52.50.Lp -Plasma production and heating by shock waves and compression Abstract -We present measurements from the ESA/NASA Cluster mission that show in situ acceleration of ions to energies of 1 MeV outside the bow shock. The observed heating can be associated with the presence of electromagnetic structures with strong spatial gradients of the electric field that lead to ion gyro-phase breaking and to the onset of chaos in ion t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This process is schematically represented in Figure b. For a single Alfvén wave, the upper energy limit attainable via this process can be much larger than the wave potential [ McChesney et al ., ] and in multiple waves or nonplanar field variations, which seem appropriate for our case, the stochastic threshold can be considerably lower than given by equation and the energy gain commensurately larger [ Stasiewicz et al ., ]. Simulations of this process based on observations from the FAST satellite of large‐amplitude dispersive Alfvén waves [ Chaston et al ., ] have demonstrated rapid gains in perpendicular ion energy as a consequence of trapping and multiple transitions through the wave potential to energies in excess of 10 keV over timescales of the order of a minute—much of this energy appears in the parallel direction due to the action of the mirror force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process is schematically represented in Figure b. For a single Alfvén wave, the upper energy limit attainable via this process can be much larger than the wave potential [ McChesney et al ., ] and in multiple waves or nonplanar field variations, which seem appropriate for our case, the stochastic threshold can be considerably lower than given by equation and the energy gain commensurately larger [ Stasiewicz et al ., ]. Simulations of this process based on observations from the FAST satellite of large‐amplitude dispersive Alfvén waves [ Chaston et al ., ] have demonstrated rapid gains in perpendicular ion energy as a consequence of trapping and multiple transitions through the wave potential to energies in excess of 10 keV over timescales of the order of a minute—much of this energy appears in the parallel direction due to the action of the mirror force.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electromagnetic activity is commonly associated with increased fluxes of energetic particles [ Ipavich et al , ; Burgess et al , , ]. It is believed that interactions of charged particles with the shock and the foreshock wave structures lead to particle acceleration and heating of the plasma, but these processes are not fully understood in detail [ Lee , ; Gordon et al , ; Stasiewicz et al , ]. For this reason studies of the foreshock's waves and related wave‐particle interactions are important for better understanding of similar processes in astrophysics, in particular the generation of cosmic rays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron-ion energy transfer rate (5 Â 10 5 < Eei < 1:2 Â 10 6 s À1 for T e ¼ 10 eV) could marginally explain T i reaching 10 eV if n e is at its maximum but could not explain the observed T i exceeding T e . Stochastic ion heating [42][43][44][45] is a likely candidate to explain such a strong ion heating. This heating mechanism occurs when a radially dependent electrostatic potential fluctuation satisfies the stochasticity threshold condition…”
Section: B Electron Ohmic Heating and Ion Stochastic Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%