1985
DOI: 10.1119/1.14084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration without radiation

Abstract: We study the radiation generated by electric currents in (1) infinite cylinders with longitudinal flow, (2) infinite cylinders with solenoidal flow, and (3) infinite planes. In each case we work out four specific examples, for which the retarded fields can be calculated exactly, and we derive a "Larmor-like" formula for the power radiated, in the limit of infinitesimal cross-section. We then consider sinusoidal currents with finite cross-section, and discover that for certain special frequencies the external f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major qualitative result of the present analysis is the same as that of Abbott and Griffiths [2]: the fields outside a solenoid include electromagnetic radiation for a short time after the current starts to flow. Is this radiation in fact detectable?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The major qualitative result of the present analysis is the same as that of Abbott and Griffiths [2]: the fields outside a solenoid include electromagnetic radiation for a short time after the current starts to flow. Is this radiation in fact detectable?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…If we applied the approximations of Abbott and Griffiths [2] to the direct calculation of E θ then we would obtain only the first term of eq. (24) but with z − being called z 0 .…”
Section: Z 0 > √ 2armentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This shows that must be zero outside the solenoid andḟ = 0. We remark that this kind of field has been shown to have peculiar properties with respect to radiation as well [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%