Advances in Neutron Capture Therapy 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2978-1_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerator Neutron Irradiation Facility for Hospital-Based Neutron Capture Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For practical treatments the proton beam current was estimated to be 4 to 50 mA. 2,3 Such currents will cause a significant challenge to the target cooling system, because lithium has a low melting point ͑181°C͒ and low thermal conductivity ͑85 W/m°C͒. If molten lithium is considered as the target, a target container with very thin wall thickness and high heat conductivity, high strength must be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For practical treatments the proton beam current was estimated to be 4 to 50 mA. 2,3 Such currents will cause a significant challenge to the target cooling system, because lithium has a low melting point ͑181°C͒ and low thermal conductivity ͑85 W/m°C͒. If molten lithium is considered as the target, a target container with very thin wall thickness and high heat conductivity, high strength must be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous designs for accelerator driven BNCT (Boron Neutron Capture Therapy) systems based on neutrons generated by @, n) reactions of low energy (few MeV) proton beams on lithium targets have required cw beam currents in the range of 20 to 50 milliamps (1,2). Achieving such high current levels will require substantial technical development, and will tend to be expensivea significant factor in determiwig whether such systems will be practical for widespread use in hospitals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence it seems difficult to use over 20 mA of beam current. For higher power beam a rotating target [4] or Liz0 at the cost of lower neutron yield cou Id be used. …”
Section: Target Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A beam energy of 2.5 MeV along with Li target appears to be the best choice in the aspect of neutronics [4]. And we consider that the use of Be target with a higher beam energy of 3.5 MeV is worthy of pursuing as it allows a simpler target system, which fits better into the hospital environment.…”
Section: Introdljctionmentioning
confidence: 97%