2011
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/16022594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerator science in medical physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The former, due to their fast cycling and larger beam current characteristics, provide higher dose rates than the latter. More advanced accelerator designs, such as the non-scaling fixed-field alternating gradient (NS-FFAG) and dielectric wall accelerators [14][15][16], could, in principle, deliver much higher dose rates, with the potential advantage of shorter patient treatment times and some degree of improved throughput, even though set-up time is usually longer than treatment time. Personal observations of synchrotron treatments in Japan can take over 2 h to deliver a single radical fraction, although at least half of the time is taken up by positioning of patients and verification of each of four different treatment fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former, due to their fast cycling and larger beam current characteristics, provide higher dose rates than the latter. More advanced accelerator designs, such as the non-scaling fixed-field alternating gradient (NS-FFAG) and dielectric wall accelerators [14][15][16], could, in principle, deliver much higher dose rates, with the potential advantage of shorter patient treatment times and some degree of improved throughput, even though set-up time is usually longer than treatment time. Personal observations of synchrotron treatments in Japan can take over 2 h to deliver a single radical fraction, although at least half of the time is taken up by positioning of patients and verification of each of four different treatment fields.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to x-ray therapy, radiotherapy with charged hadronic species such as protons feature a depth-dose curve that concentrates the dose around the Bragg peak, a characteristic of the Bethe-Bloch energy loss for these particles. 24,25,26,27,28 The depth at which the peak occurs increases with particle energy; for incident protons above 70 MeV an approximate rule of thumb is that protons lose around 1 MeV per millimetre of water traversed, although this reduces with increasing incident energy. The range of a 230 MeV proton is roughly 33 cm in water, so that this energy is sufficient to be used for tumour treatment in a typical adult patient.…”
Section: Particle Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protons are not absorbed; they deposit their kinetic energy gradually and at a rate inversely proportional to that energy (that is, inversely proportional to the velocity squared for nonrelativistic particles), so that most of the energy is deposited near to the end of the proton's range in a target; this highdose end is the Bragg peak. The Bethe-Bloch equation that describes this varies slightly according to which corrections are used [29][30][31], but a common formula (from the Particle Data Group [32]) is…”
Section: Hadron Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As its inventor Ernest Lawrence realisedand for which he was awarded a Nobel Prize -as low energy protons are accelerated their speed increases with their kinetic energy such that their revolution frequency remains constant [31,[47][48][49].An alternating voltage applied with constant frequency to the gap between the dees enables the protons to be accelerated when crossing the gap in either direction, the applied frequency f a being either the same as the revolution frequency f r or some harmonic of it h = f r / f a ; h is termed the harmonic number. Lawrence's key insight was the observation that the bend radius ρ in a given field strength B is proportional to the proton momentum p such that…”
Section: Cyclotronsmentioning
confidence: 99%