2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2003.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerometer identification using shock excitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Often the phase is omitted [4,6] resulting in a calibration only applicable when measuring nearly harmonic signals. System identification [7] is sometimes applied to convert experimentally determined infinite-dimensional FRFs [8] to a parametrized form [3,9] convenient for analysis. This operation also verifies the correctness of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often the phase is omitted [4,6] resulting in a calibration only applicable when measuring nearly harmonic signals. System identification [7] is sometimes applied to convert experimentally determined infinite-dimensional FRFs [8] to a parametrized form [3,9] convenient for analysis. This operation also verifies the correctness of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accelerometer can be regarded as a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) mechanical system (Link and Von Martens, 2004). It is often modelled by a simple mass m, called proofmass, attached to a spring of stiffness k and a dashpot with damping coefficient c (Figure 1).…”
Section: Numerical Integrator For Accelerometersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An on-board ultrahigh-g deceleration-time recorder, which is based on the proposed design, was installed at 'Test point'; the experimental setting is shown in figure 7 Next, the new on-board system and the sensor must carry out dynamic calibration together, as shown in figure 8. Based on ISO 16063-13, a laser interferometer (a modified Michelson-type laser interferometer) was set as the primary standard source [17,[33][34][35][36] at Test point (figure 8(a)) to measure variations of the real acceleration and time. Figure 8(b) shows the acceleration-time data recorded by the on-board measurement system in the dynamic calibration experiment.…”
Section: Experiments and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%