2002
DOI: 10.1177/02627x02021002004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accents of Guilt?

Abstract: This study examined the effect of regional accent on the attribution of guilt. One hundred and nineteen participants listened to a recorded exchange between a British male criminal suspect and a male policeman. Employing the “matched-guise” technique, this exchange was varied to produce a 2 (accent type: Birmingham/standard) 2 (race of suspect: Black/White) 2 (crime type: blue collar/white collar) independent-groups design. The results suggested that the suspect was rated as significantly more guilty when he e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, unlike other kinds of discrimination, we have no statistics for incidences of discrimination because of speech. But there are many case studies and personal accounts (for examples see [1]), and sociophonetic studies continually reveal the likely consequences of discrimination based on the way someone speaks: [23] found speakers with non-standard accents were perceived as guiltier, which could have consequences within court proceedings; [77] found non-standard speakers are less credible in radio advertisements; and [6] found UK teachers with regional accents are being told to sound more 'professional'. The study of non-native accents is more complex although such speakers were judged as less employable, particularly for customer facing roles, in [85].…”
Section: Speech Ideologies Shape People's Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, unlike other kinds of discrimination, we have no statistics for incidences of discrimination because of speech. But there are many case studies and personal accounts (for examples see [1]), and sociophonetic studies continually reveal the likely consequences of discrimination based on the way someone speaks: [23] found speakers with non-standard accents were perceived as guiltier, which could have consequences within court proceedings; [77] found non-standard speakers are less credible in radio advertisements; and [6] found UK teachers with regional accents are being told to sound more 'professional'. The study of non-native accents is more complex although such speakers were judged as less employable, particularly for customer facing roles, in [85].…”
Section: Speech Ideologies Shape People's Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our view, comprehension is the composite of social and linguistic activation. And, phonetic variation that cues unreliability (such as foreign-accents to the ears of many AE listeners) may alter the way one attends to the stimuli (see also Dixon et al, 2002; Gluszek and Dovidio, 2010). It is the age-old question of the chicken and the egg, except that our experimental predictions diverge and the issue can be resolved.…”
Section: Achieving Socially Weighted Encoding: a Dual-route Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate, consider findings suggesting that a foreign accent decreases a speaker's credibility (Dragojevic & Giles, 2016;Lev-Ari & Keysar, 2010). Such a decrease of credibility has been attributed to the impact of stereotypes and prejudice (Dixon, Mahoney, & Cocks, 2002). foreign accent on credibility.…”
Section: Fluency In Social Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%