2021
DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1917759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of male circumcision for HIV prevention among men who have sex with men in China: a short report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we found that although MSM participants demonstrated knowledge of the HIV prevention effect of male circumcision, there was a misperception that circumcision should follow sex role aggregation: only males who mainly practice penetrative anal sex should be circumcised. A similar finding was reported in China, [24] where circumcision uptake is low amongst MSM, [25] and males who mainly practice receptive anal sex perceive themselves as having low risk for HIV acquisition and regard circumcision as unnecessary.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…In our study, we found that although MSM participants demonstrated knowledge of the HIV prevention effect of male circumcision, there was a misperception that circumcision should follow sex role aggregation: only males who mainly practice penetrative anal sex should be circumcised. A similar finding was reported in China, [24] where circumcision uptake is low amongst MSM, [25] and males who mainly practice receptive anal sex perceive themselves as having low risk for HIV acquisition and regard circumcision as unnecessary.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…In the identified literature, many studies cited the TFA, however, their application of the framework was inconsistent. For example, some studies did not use the definition of acceptability by Sekhon et al (2017); rather, they developed their own definitions such as: patient consent to proceed with a surgical procedure (Sood et al, 2020); willingness to consider surgery (Yuan et al, 2022); and the absence of complications ( Jha et al, 2021). Some reports did not provide a definition or report how acceptability was measured (Bazzurini et al, 2022;James et al, 2021).…”
Section: Self-efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%