Acceptability of rapid HIV diagnosis technology among primary healthcare practitioners in Spain

Abstract

This study investigated the acceptability of rapid HIV testing among general practitioners (GP) and aimed to identify perceived barriers and needs in order to implement rapid testing in primary care settings. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed online to all members of the two largest Spanish scientific medical societies for family and community medicine. The study took place between 15 June 2012 and 31 October 2010. Completed questionnaires were returned by 1308 participants. The majority (90.8%) of respondents were GP. Among all respondents, 70.4% were aware of the existence of rapid tests for the diagnosis of HIV but they did not know how to use them. Nearly 80% of participants would be willing to offer rapid HIV testing in their practices and 74.7% would be confident of the result obtained by these tests. The barriers most commonly identified by respondents were a lack of time and a need for training, both in the use of rapid tests (44.3% and 56.4%, respectively) and required pre- and post-test counselling (59.2% and 34.5%, respectively). This study reveals a high level of acceptance and willingness on the part of GPs to offer rapid HIV testing in their practices. Nevertheless, the implementation of rapid HIV testing in primary care will not be possible without moving from comprehensive pre-test counselling towards brief pre-test information and improving training in the use of rapid tests.

Making HIV testing work at the point of care in South Africa: a qualitative study of diagnostic practices

“…Much of current research focuses on cost-effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability of POC testing in one specific healthcare setting [4, 12–16] or uses clinicians’ concerns regarding POC testing as potential indicators for uptake [15, 17]. Research on diagnostic processes, the role of POC tests for clinical and patient decision-making, and the adaptation of POC programs to various socio-cultural contexts is limited.…”

Barriers to Point-of-Care Testing in India: Results from Qualitative Research across Different Settings, Users and Major Diseases

“…Qualitative and quantitative survey-based studies have examined clinicians’ attitudes towards POC testing as a potential indicator for its uptake. The most common concerns raised by clinicians were test accuracy, over-reliance on tests, undermining of clinical skills, cost, limited usefulness [ 14 ], need for training and required counselling [ 15 ], as well as lack of time, interruption of workflow and complexity [ 16 ]. Yet, clinicians’ attitudes might not reflect their daily diagnostic practices or capture systemic challenges for POC testing across the healthcare system.…”

Time devoted to pre- and post-HIV test counselling in different health services according to participants of a rapid testing program in Madrid, Spain

“…Our findings are consistent with those found in that study, and the fact that the time elapsed since the last test had no impact on them, make them trustworthy. Moreover, several studies, have examined physicians' perceived barriers to HIV testing; [11][12][13]18 these have found that two of the most common reasons given for not expanding HIV testing in general health services (primary care, hospital emergencies, etc.) are: first, lack of time, and second, perceiving themselves as not having the appropriate skills to address sexual behaviour and feeling discomfort in discussing HIV.…”