2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1369-8478(02)00046-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
275
1
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 373 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
21
275
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show the importance of the perception of fairness in the acceptance of the implementation of a road pricing scheme. This result confirms one of the main hypotheses of the literature on road pricing acceptability, namely that the degree of acceptability of a road pricing scheme is strongly linked to the perception of fairness by users (Schade and Schlag, 2003;Verhoef et al, 1997;Ubbels and Verhoef, 2006;Eriksson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Definition Of the Hybrid Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show the importance of the perception of fairness in the acceptance of the implementation of a road pricing scheme. This result confirms one of the main hypotheses of the literature on road pricing acceptability, namely that the degree of acceptability of a road pricing scheme is strongly linked to the perception of fairness by users (Schade and Schlag, 2003;Verhoef et al, 1997;Ubbels and Verhoef, 2006;Eriksson et al, 2008).…”
Section: Definition Of the Hybrid Modelsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The proposed method completes the economic approach of the discrete choice model with attitudinal factors (Ubbels and Verhoef, 2006). Therefore the acceptability approach based on cost and benefits of toll is improved with an evaluation of individual attitudes towards pricing (Bamberg and RoTle, 2003;Jones, 2003;and Schade and Schlag, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include studies in Denmark [26], Germany [31], Greece [31], Italy [31], Norway [31], Japan [48], Netherlands (e.g. [3,27,32,39,[42][43][44][45][46][47]), New Zealand [27], Portugal [49], United Kingdom (e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent survey, Bperceived environmental effectiveness and expectation of local co-benefits are the main drivers of acceptability^ (Baranzini and Carattini 2017, 18). Several studies have also shown that perception frequently changes after the implementation of environmental prices initiatives, as people experience less negative and more positive consequences than they expected in terms of perceived effectiveness, personal outcome expectations, and fairness of the system (Schade and Schlag 2003;Schuitema et al 2010;Jagers et al 2017). At the present time, the question has not been asked, in Europe or elsewhere, whether citizens support a measure that will (i) reduce the price of low-polluting products previously subject to VAT; (ii) increase by about 3% the price of the products previously not subject to VAT; (iii) increase the price of the most polluting products in proportion to their degree of pollution.…”
Section: Acceptability Of the Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%