2006
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.9.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptable Noise Level as a Predictor of Hearing Aid Use

Abstract: Acceptable noise level (ANL) measures a listener's reaction to background noise while listening to speech. Relations among hearing aid use and ANL, speech in noise (SPIN) scores, and listener characteristics (age, gender, pure-tone average) were investigated in 191 listeners with hearing impairment. Listeners were assigned to one of three groups based on patterns of hearing aid use: full-time use (whenever hearing aids are needed), part-time use (occasional use), or nonuse. Results showed that SPIN scores and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
272
16
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(317 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
21
272
16
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Nabelek et al, 1991;Nabelek et al, 2004;Harkrider & Smith, 2005;Freyaldenhoven et al, 2006;Gordon-Hickey & Moore, 2007), middle ear function (Harkrider & Smith, 2005), outer hair cell function (click evoked otoacoustic emissions) (Harkrider & Smith, 2005), or the efferent pathways utilising the medial olivocochlear bundle (contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions and contralateral stimulation of the acoustic reflex) (Harkrider & Smith, 2005). ANL seems not to be generally related to speech recognition scores in noise (Bilger et al, 1984) in normal-hearing or hearing-impaired subjects (Nabelek et al, 2004;Nabelek et al, 2006;von Hapsburg & Bahng, 2006). This suggests that speech perception in noise taps into a different aspect of listening in noise than ANL processing and has been taken as evidence that acceptance of background noise is an intrinsic characteristic of the individual subject.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Danish and Swedish Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nabelek et al, 1991;Nabelek et al, 2004;Harkrider & Smith, 2005;Freyaldenhoven et al, 2006;Gordon-Hickey & Moore, 2007), middle ear function (Harkrider & Smith, 2005), outer hair cell function (click evoked otoacoustic emissions) (Harkrider & Smith, 2005), or the efferent pathways utilising the medial olivocochlear bundle (contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions and contralateral stimulation of the acoustic reflex) (Harkrider & Smith, 2005). ANL seems not to be generally related to speech recognition scores in noise (Bilger et al, 1984) in normal-hearing or hearing-impaired subjects (Nabelek et al, 2004;Nabelek et al, 2006;von Hapsburg & Bahng, 2006). This suggests that speech perception in noise taps into a different aspect of listening in noise than ANL processing and has been taken as evidence that acceptance of background noise is an intrinsic characteristic of the individual subject.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Danish and Swedish Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Danish and Swedish versions of the English instructions (Nabelek, 1991;Rogers et al, 2003;Nabelek et al, 2004;Nabelek et al, 2006). The complete Danish and Swedish instructions are presented in Appendices A and B.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Nabelek et al (2006) subjects with an ANL less than 7 dB are likely to become successful, full-time hearing aid users, while subjects with an ANL more than 13 dB are likely to become unsuccessful users who wear hearing aids occasionally or not at all. For subjects with an ANL between 7 and 13 dB the use pattern cannot be predicted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task was to select the maximum background noise level (BNL) that the participant was willing to accept while following the speech. The listeners were given oral and written instructions, which were Dutch translations of the instructions provided by Nabelek et al (2006). For each ANL measurement the BNL procedure was repeated three times and the mean value was used to calculate the ANL as the difference of the speech level and the mean BNL.…”
Section: Acceptable Noise Level Testmentioning
confidence: 99%