2008
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.8043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptable safety of bevacizumab therapy in patients with brain metastases due to non-small cell lung cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there were previous safety concerns regarding the use of bevacizumab in patients with brain metastases, the incidence of ICH in this study was low and similar to historical controls in NSCLC without brain metastases, although direct cross-trial comparisons should be viewed with caution (30)(31)(32). One could hypothesise that the small lesions described in the study (mean size, 13 mm) might be less likely to bleed or perhaps have less intracranial edema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there were previous safety concerns regarding the use of bevacizumab in patients with brain metastases, the incidence of ICH in this study was low and similar to historical controls in NSCLC without brain metastases, although direct cross-trial comparisons should be viewed with caution (30)(31)(32). One could hypothesise that the small lesions described in the study (mean size, 13 mm) might be less likely to bleed or perhaps have less intracranial edema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Retrospective analyses of patients with NSCLC and treated brain metastases in the ATLAS and PASSPORT studies reported no grade >2 hemorrhages (n ¼ 85; ref. 32). A recent evidence-based review was carried out on the risk of CNS hemorrhage in patients with NSCLC receiving anti-VEGF therapy, which concluded that there was no significantly increased risk of CNS hemorrhage associated with anti-VEGF therapy (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a particular concern with VEGFI toxicity because of the high likelihood of fatality; however, evidence is lacking in the metastatic setting because patients with brain metastases have largely been excluded from phase II and phase III clinical trials. Small studies have reported a low likelihood of central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage [56]; however, major CNS bleeding has been reported in a handful of patients treated with either sorafenib, bevacizumab, or sunitinib [50], and it is prudent to offer VEGFI therapy to patients with stable brain metastases and after local measures (radiotherapy with or without surgery) have been undertaken. Higher mortality from ICH was reported in patients on sunitinib or sorafenib, but this may have been related to the effects of uncontrolled hypertension rather than hemorrhage per se [57].…”
Section: Clinical Manifestations and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PASSPORT is a phase II study to assess bevacizumab in combination with first-or second-line chemotherapy in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC and brain metastases. An early analysis including 85 bevacizumab-treated NSCLC patients with brain metastases in the ATLAS and PASSPORT trials has recently been reported [41]. In this cohort, no CNS hemorrhages occurred during bevacizumab treatment and a single grade 2 CNS bleed was observed during postprogression therapy.…”
Section: Bevacizumab In Patients With Brain Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 92%