Computer-Mediated Communication Systems 1982
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-404980-2.50009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptance and Usage of Computer-Mediated Communication Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume and pace of information can become overwhelming, especially since messages are not necessarily sequential and multiple topic threads are common, resulting in amongst other factors, information overload (Hiltz and Turoff, 1985;Kerr and Hiltz, 1982). As defined by Bawden (2001): "Information overload occurs when information received becomes a hindrance rather than a help when the information is potentially useful".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume and pace of information can become overwhelming, especially since messages are not necessarily sequential and multiple topic threads are common, resulting in amongst other factors, information overload (Hiltz and Turoff, 1985;Kerr and Hiltz, 1982). As defined by Bawden (2001): "Information overload occurs when information received becomes a hindrance rather than a help when the information is potentially useful".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, CCNA differs from the standard NG approach because, after the initial presentation of a summary of individual member opinions, the group works towards a consensus rather than using a majority vote. Consensus decision making is more feasible with the CCNA technique because interactive group problems, which the nominal group approach is designed to overcome, tend to be less dominant in the computer conference (Kerr and Hiltz 1982). At the same time, CCNA should exhibit an advantage over the CCA methodology, as does NG over IG (Bufton 1987), since it should aid in the generation of ideas by encouraging more individual contributions.…”
Section: Small Group Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turoff and Hiltz (1982) concluded that there was no difference in the quality of decisions made by small FTF groups as compared to computer conferencing decisions. Kerr and Hiltz (1982) received a mixed response from a panel of experts questioned on a variety of experiences on the quality of decisions resulting from computer conferencing compared to FTF conferences. Factors which affect decision making in computer mediated conferences have also been examined (Kiesler et al 1984, McGuire et al 1987, Siegel et al 1986).…”
Section: Small Group Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9,16,35,32]. These systems often lack the ability to combine features intelligently when making decisions.…”
Section: Message Presentation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%