2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptance of Combined Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial CT Perfusion versus Conventional Coronary Angiography in Patients with Coronary Stents—Intraindividual Comparison

Abstract: ObjectivesTo evaluate how well patients with coronary stents accept combined coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial CT perfusion (CTP) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA).BackgroundWhile combined CTA and CTP may improve diagnostic accuracy compared with CTA alone, patient acceptance of CTA/CTP remains to be defined.MethodsA total of 90 patients with coronary stents prospectively underwent CTA/CTP (both with contrast agent, CTP with adenosine) and CCA as part of the CARS… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CTA evaluation is less invasive, faster, and less expensive [5] , [6] . Moreover, it does not suffer from catheter-related complications such as bleeding, stroke, or heart attack [2] , [7] . However, CTA performance is limited by temporal resolution and consequently can suffer from artifacts caused by cardiac motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CTA evaluation is less invasive, faster, and less expensive [5] , [6] . Moreover, it does not suffer from catheter-related complications such as bleeding, stroke, or heart attack [2] , [7] . However, CTA performance is limited by temporal resolution and consequently can suffer from artifacts caused by cardiac motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%