2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access and Representation: A Narrative Review of the Disparities in Access to Clinical Trials and Precision Oncology in Black men with Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both phases, the two reviewers will discuss decisions and any discrepancies to reach consensus. When consensus cannot be reached, outstanding conflicts will be resolved by a third reviewer (NRP or TMF) who has extensive experience in conducting reviews relevant to cancer care [ 45 50 ]. Reasons for exclusion will be documented, and all selection procedures will conform to the PRIMSA-ScR guidance [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both phases, the two reviewers will discuss decisions and any discrepancies to reach consensus. When consensus cannot be reached, outstanding conflicts will be resolved by a third reviewer (NRP or TMF) who has extensive experience in conducting reviews relevant to cancer care [ 45 50 ]. Reasons for exclusion will be documented, and all selection procedures will conform to the PRIMSA-ScR guidance [ 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study analyzing 72 prostate cancer trials with start dates between 1987 and 2016, EAM accounted for 96% of all trial participants 81 . With the advancement of precision medicine, it is imperative to improve representation in trial enrollment in order to ensure properly validated biomarkers, and subsequently, an appropriate treatment decision for the general population, especially for those from marginalized and high‐risk backgrounds 82 . Here we identify clinical trials started after 2016 that investigated personalized therapy for prostate cancer in order to examine the representation of AAM across prostate cancer precision therapy trials.…”
Section: Germline and Somatic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 81 With the advancement of precision medicine, it is imperative to improve representation in trial enrollment in order to ensure properly validated biomarkers, and subsequently, an appropriate treatment decision for the general population, especially for those from marginalized and high‐risk backgrounds. 82 Here we identify clinical trials started after 2016 that investigated personalized therapy for prostate cancer in order to examine the representation of AAM across prostate cancer precision therapy trials. We carried out a literature search on clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov) using the keywords: PDL‐1, Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Cemiplimab, Durvalumab, PARPi, Veliparib, Olaparib, Niraparib, Rucaparib, Talazoparib, Lutetium, and 177Lu.…”
Section: Germline and Somatic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar trends are seen in prostate cancer. 45 It is also important to consider that single-gene testing, while less costly, more accessible, and more often ordered by physicians, may be less effective at identifying molecular targets, especially for diseases in which multiple potential targets have been elucidated. 44 Socioeconomic status also influences rates of somatic molecular testing due to associated actual, perceived, and indirect costs.…”
Section: Extrinsic Factors Influencing Precision Oncology Disparitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%