Access and Utilization of Asthma Medications Among Patients Who Receive Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Abstract

Objectives: To describe access to and use of prescription asthma medications, and to assess factors associated with asthma exacerbation, healthcare utilization, and health status among asthma patients treated at Federally Qualified Health Centers. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. We analyzed data from the 2014 National Health Center Patient Survey. This data is publicly available from the Health Resources and Services Administration. Data was collected from patients receiving face-to-face care from health centers funded under Section 330 of the Public Health Service Act. Data from patients was collected between October 8, 2014, and April 17, 2015. We included adult participants who reported having a diagnosis of asthma and confirmed that they still have asthma. Association between explanatory variables (access to prescription medications and use of asthma controller medications) and outcome variables (asthma exacerbations, asthma hospitalizations or emergency department visits, and self-rated health) was assessed using multivariable regression analyses while adjusting for demographics. Results: A total of 919 participants with asthma were included. Approximately 32% of the participants experienced delays in getting prescription medications, 26% were unable to get them, 60% experienced an asthma exacerbation last year, 48% rated their health as fair/poor, and 19% visited a hospital or an emergency department last year. Multivariable results showed that participants who were currently taking controller medications were more likely to have experienced an asthma exacerbation (OR = 4.02; 95% CI 1.91 to 8.45; P < .01), or visited a hospital or an emergency department (OR = 3.07; 95% CI 1.39 to 6.73; P < .01) in the last year compared with those who had never taken controller medications. Experiencing difficulties in accessing asthma medications was associated with lower self-rated health ([Formula: see text] = −.51; 95% CI −0.94 to −0.08; P = .02). Conclusions: Future interventions should seek to improve asthma patient care and health outcomes using innovative strategies that act at multiple levels of the healthcare system (eg, individual, interpersonal, community levels).

Socioeconomic and environmental determinants of asthma prevalence: a cross-sectional study at the U.S. County level using geographically weighted random forests

“…“Besides aggregated area-level characteristics (e.g., ethnicity, age, and smoking) associated with asthma prevalence and asthma-related health outcomes [ 3 – 6 ], there is tentative evidence that also socioeconomic and environmental determinants are at play [ 7 , 8 ]. In the United States, for example, a yearly family income of less than $50,000, a lack of a high school education, and living in high-poverty areas were all connected to an increased risk of asthma [ 9 ].…”