Background
Visual decline is inevitable in older adults. Utilizing preventive vision care can mitigate major risk factors, yet the uptake rate remains suboptimal globally. Barriers to seek preventive eye care were identified in the literature. However, the understanding of these barriers was limited by the quantitative approach, hindering the opportunity to suggest specific strategies to improve service uptake. This qualitative aimed to identify the factors influencing the decision-making process of older adults to use preventive vision care.
Methods
This was a qualitative study guided by the grounded theory approach. Purposive sampling was used to recruit the subjects. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or above in Hong Kong. Data were transcribed and constant comparison techniques were used for data analysis.
Results
The core theme revealed a decision-making process of being difficult in “prioritising and fitting preventive vision care into the existing health service utilization” for older people when deciding the utilization of preventive vision care. Five sub-themes were identified to explain the low preventive vision care utilization. Specifically, in absence of past preventive vision care utilization experience, most rely on other “previous health service utilization” to guide their judgment. “Low perceived preventive vision care needs” were due to perceived low disruption of symptoms in daily practices and lack of social cues. “Low perceived self-efficacy of service utilization” was due to limited information on service availability, limited social support, limited health literacy, and financial concerns. Unfulfilled “service expectation” also lowered their motivation to use preventive vision care.
Discussion
This study found that multiple factors influenced the decision-making process and reduced the motivation of subjects to use preventive vision care. Future interventions could exploit the benefit of social influences on the identified factors so that preventive vision care can smoothly fit into the ongoing healthcare use. Adopting a longitudinal qualitative perspective would enrich understanding the reasons for not using preventive vision care.