2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access to a Canadian provincial integrated trauma system: A population-based cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[59][60][61] Therefore, undercoverage from patients being treated in trauma centres that are not included in the registry or in non-trauma centres should not have had a major effect on our frequency estimate. However, we could not link 21.9% of the National Trauma Registry to the Discharge Abstract Database.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[59][60][61] Therefore, undercoverage from patients being treated in trauma centres that are not included in the registry or in non-trauma centres should not have had a major effect on our frequency estimate. However, we could not link 21.9% of the National Trauma Registry to the Discharge Abstract Database.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also found that injury severity [23,24], the body region of the worst injury [24], age [24], and the Glasgow Coma Score [24] were determinants of resource use. Our study has gone further by providing resource use estimates using a registry that includes data on 92% of major injury admissions [44], exploring additional determinants, and investigating inter-hospital variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure high data quality, the registry is centralised at the Ministry of Health and Social Services of Quebec and is subject to periodic audits. Population coverage is high because 90% of major trauma patients are admitted to a trauma centre 21 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%