Access to care of frail community-dwelling older adults in Belgium: a qualitative study

Abstract

AimThis paper aims to identify barriers that frail community-dwelling older adults experience regarding access to formal care and support services.BackgroundUniversal access to healthcare has been set by the World Health Organisation (WHO) as a main goal for the post-2015 development agenda. Nevertheless, regarding access to care, particular attention has to be paid to the so-called vulnerable groups, such as (frail) older adults.MethodsBoth inductive and deductive content analyses were performed on 22 individual interviews with frail, community-dwelling older adults who indicated they lacked care and support. The coding scheme was generated from the conceptual framework ‘6A’s of access to care and support’ (referring to work of Penchansky and Thomas, 1981; Wyszewianski, 2002; Saurman, 2016) and applied on the transcripts.FindingsResults indicate that (despite all policy measures) access to a broad spectrum of care and support services remains a challenge for older people in Belgium. The respondents’ barriers concern: ‘affordability’ referring to a lot of Belgian older adults having limited pensions, ‘accessibility’ going beyond geographical accessibility but also concerning waiting lists, ‘availability’ referring to the lack of having someone around, ‘adequacy’ addressing the insufficiency of motivated staff, the absence of trust in care providers influencing ‘acceptability’, and ‘awareness’ referring to limited health literacy. The discussion develops the argument that in order to make care and support more accessible for people in order to be able to age in place, governments should take measures to overcome these access limitations (eg, by automatic entitlements) and should take into account a broad description of access. Also, a seventh barrier (a seventh A) within the results, namely ‘ageism’, was discovered.

Palliative care for rural growth and wellbeing: identifying perceived barriers and facilitators in access to palliative care in rural Indiana, USA

“…Ideally, Palliative care should be initiated alongside a diagnosis of a serious chronic or life-threatening illness to address holistic care needs of patients and families, allow adequate care planning, faciltate treatment choices, advance goals of care, and reduce distress among patients and families [ 4 ]. Evidence indicate that adequate access and provision of palliative care improves pain and symptom management [ 5 ], enables informed decision making [ 6 ], reduces hospital readmissions and healthcare costs [ 7 , 8 ]. Despite multiple benefits, palliative care access remains a challenge in the United States especially in smaller towns and rural communities.…”

Barriers and facilitators in providing care for patients with a migration background

“…Despite good initiatives, many healthcare professionals often continue to work only in their own domain and within their own discipline, and the bridge to other care or services is not, or not sufficiently, established. Patients need access to acceptable and accessible care and welfare, but the patient must also be able to trust that those care and welfare services can correctly and supportively refer to other services that are needed to fully meet the patient's needs (Fret et al, 2019; UN, 2020).…”

Towards an understanding of inequalities in accessing residential and nursing home provision: The role of geographical approaches

“…Glasby et al., 2019 ; Netten et al., 2005 ). Concerns regarding changing levels of social care supply in relation to demographic trends are also mirrored in wider international contexts (see for example Fret et al., 2019 ; Matei et al., 2018 ; Walker et al., 2019 ).…”