2015
DOI: 10.1080/10564934.2015.1001267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access to Higher Education at the End of Lower Secondary for “Disadvantaged” Students: The Interplay of Structural, Institutional Frameworks and Student Agency

Abstract: Drawing from quantitative and qualitative data collected by the European research project GOETE in eight European countries, the article focuses on the experiences of so-called "disadvantaged students" at the end of lower secondary and analyzes how access to higher education is negotiated in the interaction of structural/institutional frameworks and student agency. After elaborating an intersectional framework on disadvantage, the article showcases that access to higher education is defined by national schooli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies in the education field have considered the role of agency and structure in shaping educational pathways (Danic, ; Schoon and Lyons‐Amos, , ), with some adopting a life course perspective (Schoon and Lyons‐Amos, ; Schoon and Lyons‐Amos, ). Danic () draws on qualitative and quantitative data collected from eight European countries as part of the Governance of Educational Trajectories in Europe (GOETE) research project and considers how ‘disadvantaged’ students negotiate access to higher education within the context of structural — and institutional — frameworks and individual student agency. The author found that access to higher education was ‘defined’ by student attitudes, professionals' discourse and national schooling regulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in the education field have considered the role of agency and structure in shaping educational pathways (Danic, ; Schoon and Lyons‐Amos, , ), with some adopting a life course perspective (Schoon and Lyons‐Amos, ; Schoon and Lyons‐Amos, ). Danic () draws on qualitative and quantitative data collected from eight European countries as part of the Governance of Educational Trajectories in Europe (GOETE) research project and considers how ‘disadvantaged’ students negotiate access to higher education within the context of structural — and institutional — frameworks and individual student agency. The author found that access to higher education was ‘defined’ by student attitudes, professionals' discourse and national schooling regulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%