“…Similar adaptations were reported to what has been already described in some studies from Australia and elsewhere, regarding the way that continuous care to people with HIV and PrEP users was sustained, and the most urgent elements of STI screening and treatment, as well as contraception and (medical) abortion, maintained. 4,[23][24][25]36,37 Although difficult to compare across settings, the work invested in adapting rapidly suggests that the impacts on sexual and reproductive healthcare services were not as dramatic in Australia as they had the potential to be, and were in many settings. 6,9,12,13,[38][39][40][41] As reported elsewhere, 42 there were anxieties expressed by our participants about the longer-term health impacts of service restrictions, although there was clear agreement that it was essential to protect access to HIV therapies, PrEP, testing and treatment of symptomatic STIs, contraception and abortion.…”