2018
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201807749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access to P‐ and Axially Chiral Biaryl Phosphine Oxides by Enantioselective CpxIrIII‐Catalyzed C−H Arylations

Abstract: An enantioselective C-H arylation of phosphine oxides with o-quinone diazides catalyzed by an iridium(III) complex bearing an atropchiral cyclopentadienyl (Cp ) ligand and phthaloyl tert-leucine as co-catalyst is reported. The method allows access to a) P-chiral biaryl phosphine oxides, b) atropo-enantioselective construction of sterically demanding biaryl backbones, and also c) selective assembly of axial and P-chiral compounds in excellent yields and diastereo- and enantioselectivities. Enantiospecific reduc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 307 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
105
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such striking through‐space electronic influences likely account for the prevalence of proximally positioned OR and NR groups in ligands widely exploited in catalysis (e.g. SPhos, SagePhos, BI‐DIME) . Interestingly, the strong electro‐enhancing influence of the 2,6‐dimethoxy groups was found to be completely switched off in compound 1‐b ( σ p(conf) =+0.03, green in Figure C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such striking through‐space electronic influences likely account for the prevalence of proximally positioned OR and NR groups in ligands widely exploited in catalysis (e.g. SPhos, SagePhos, BI‐DIME) . Interestingly, the strong electro‐enhancing influence of the 2,6‐dimethoxy groups was found to be completely switched off in compound 1‐b ( σ p(conf) =+0.03, green in Figure C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, when one wishes to functionalize enantiotopic C−H bonds of prochiral substrates to generate chiral products, stereocontrol at the C−H bond cleavage step, that is, an enantioselective C−H activation, is crucial. Cramer and co‐workers, followed by Li and co‐workers, have achieved such enantioselective C−H activation/functionalization reactions by using well‐designed chiral Cp x M III catalysts (Scheme a), where a chiral carboxylic acid was sometimes employed as a secondary chiral source . Although this strategy is successful for the enantioselective functionalization of C(sp 2 )−H bonds, functionalization of less reactive enantiotopic C(sp 3 )−H bonds has not yet been achieved.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most spectacular example of their utility has been the use of (S P )-PAMP {o-anisylmethylphenylphosphine} and (R P ,R P )-DIPAMP {1,2-bis(o-anisylmethylphenylphosphine)ethane} di as chiral ligands in rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of enamides [5] which led to the first application of such a process in the industrial production, i.e., the Monsanto L-DOPA process [6] However, P-stereogenicity is not a natural phenomenon, and, from the very beginning [7], it had to be generated in the lab. Despite many developed asymmetric syntheses [1,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], desymmetrizations [14,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and kinetic resolutions [28][29][30][31][32][33][34], practical preparations of optically active P-stereogenic compounds are still relying in great part on classical resolution of racemates [7,8,[35][36][37][38][39][40]. The latter has the advantage to rely on cheap and often recoverable chiral auxiliaries, uses crystallization for separation of the P-epimers and, The subsequent resolution of rac-1 started with its reduction to the corresponding phosphine 2 by treatment with PhSiH 3 at the t...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%