2005
DOI: 10.1177/004005990503800201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access to the General Education Curriculum for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instructional matrices can provide an effective way of implementing skill clusters and other procedures cited in Table 2 since they offer systematic means of targeting goals and objectives within the general education curriculum (Giangreco et al, 1993;Jorgensen, 1994;Cushing et al, 2005). Table 3 provides an example of a matrix developed for Tara, a third grader with Angelman syndrome, a genetic disorder usually resulting from a deletion on the long arm of the 15th chromosome (Williams et al, 1995).…”
Section: Instructional Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instructional matrices can provide an effective way of implementing skill clusters and other procedures cited in Table 2 since they offer systematic means of targeting goals and objectives within the general education curriculum (Giangreco et al, 1993;Jorgensen, 1994;Cushing et al, 2005). Table 3 provides an example of a matrix developed for Tara, a third grader with Angelman syndrome, a genetic disorder usually resulting from a deletion on the long arm of the 15th chromosome (Williams et al, 1995).…”
Section: Instructional Matricesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one element of a multifaceted approach to supporting general education participation, peer support arrangements should be considered alongside other individualized support strategiesVsuch as curricular modifications, related services, and other classroom-level practicesVthat are likely to enhance students' academic and social success. Cushing et al (2005) outlined one process for determining how peer support interventions could be coupled with other instructional and support tactics to ensure that youth with severe disabilities participate meaningfully within the general curriculum. Similar instructional planning models have been described in other sources (e.g., McSheehan, Sonnenmeier, Jorgensen, & Turner, 2006;Wehmeyer, Lance, & Bashinski, 2002).…”
Section: Implications For Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the implementations were examined, children with various types and levels of disabilities are being placed in inclusion classes. If successful implementations are expected to be realized in the classes, correct assessment and evaluation processes should be conducted and individualized teaching plans should be written and implemented with children with SEN in the classes (Batu, Çolak and Odluyurt, 2012;Buell, Hallam, Gamel-McCormick and Scheer, 1999;Cushing, Clark, Carter and Kennedy, 2005;Freeman and Alkin, 2000).…”
Section: The Opinions Of Preschool Teachers Regarding Types Of Disabimentioning
confidence: 99%