Accessi venosi nel neonato, nel lattante e nel bambino

Boussicault, Gérald; Ollivier, M.; Allard, Lise; Ringuier, B.

doi:10.1016/s1283-0771(17)87835-x

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 87 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If the patient is uncooperative, there is a risk of procedural complications such as failure to find the vein and wasting the equipment, excessive pain while performing the procedure, accidental puncture of the adjacent peripheral artery or nerve, local or systemic infection, hematoma, venous extravasation with skin necrosis or thrombophlebitis. 2…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic analysis and time monitoring of pediatric venipuncture procedures; audio-visual distraction and Buzzy® device versus standard care: protocol of an interventional randomized controlled trial

Matteo¹,

Gentile²,

Grassi³

et al. 2023

Work Paper Public Hlth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: reducing anxiety and pain during an invasive procedure like venipuncture is crucial for preventing the onset of stress and making the nurse’s procedures faster and smoother. Distraction techniques appear to be a viable solution. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two different distraction methods in terms of cost-effectiveness and time to perform venipuncture in a hospital setting. Materials and Methods: a randomized, controlled, interventional-blinded 3-arm parallel-group study with inpatients aged 3 to 18 years old, awake and conscious, at the first venipuncture attempt and only after children and parents signed informed consent. The pain rating scales Wong-Baker FACES, Numerical Rating Scale, and Children’s Fear Scale will be used. Conclusions: pediatric pain is a challenge for medical professionals as well as a health need that must be addressed rapidly. It is crucial to assess and apply the most effective methods for adequate analgesia in shorter periods, while also reducing healthcare costs.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic analysis and time monitoring of pediatric venipuncture procedures; audio-visual distraction and Buzzy® device versus standard care: protocol of an interventional randomized controlled trial

Matteo¹,

Gentile²,

Grassi³

et al. 2023

Work Paper Public Hlth

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2,3 Careful choice of the device, appropriate insertion technique, and proper management of the device are well-known strategies commonly adopted to achieve an optimal clinical result. 4…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison between sedation room and operating room in central venous catheter positioning in children

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Placement of central venous access devices is a clinical procedure associated with some risk of adverse events and with a relevant cost. Careful choice of the device, appropriate insertion technique, and proper management of the device are well-known strategies commonly adopted to achieve an optimal clinical result. However, the environment where the procedure takes place may have an impact on the overall outcome in terms of safety and cost-effectiveness. Methods: We carried out a retrospective analysis on pediatric patients scheduled for a major neurosurgical operation, who required a central venous access device in the perioperative period. We divided the patients in two groups: in group A the central venous access device was inserted in the operating room, while in group B the central venous access device was inserted in the sedation room of our Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. We compared the two groups in terms of safety and cost-effectiveness. Results: We analyzed 47 central venous access devices in 42 children. There were no insertion-related complications. Only one catheter-related bloodstream infection was recorded, in group A. However, the costs related to central venous access device insertion were quite different: €330–€540 in group A versus €105–€135 in group B. Conclusion: In the pediatric patient candidate to a major neurosurgical operation, preoperative insertion of the central venous access device in the sedation room rather than in the operating room is less expensive and equally safe.

show abstract

Accessi venosi nel neonato, nel lattante e nel bambino

Cited by 2 publications

References 87 publications

Economic analysis and time monitoring of pediatric venipuncture procedures; audio-visual distraction and Buzzy® device versus standard care: protocol of an interventional randomized controlled trial

Economic analysis and time monitoring of pediatric venipuncture procedures; audio-visual distraction and Buzzy® device versus standard care: protocol of an interventional randomized controlled trial

Comparison between sedation room and operating room in central venous catheter positioning in children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About