1999
DOI: 10.1177/0273475399213004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility: An Alternative Method of Ranking Marketing Journals?

Abstract: Instead of using citations or marketing academics™ perceptual ranking of journals, this article examines the ranking of marketing journals using Australian university library holdings, in either hard copy or full-text electronic format. This measure was used as a proxy for broad-based accessibility of marketing journals. The study found that the accessibility rankings differed significantly from the most recent U.S. perceptual rankings, and it is suggested that in some situations, the accessibility ranking may… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has been used recently by Ryan (2005) in an indicative study of tourism journals and has also been advocated by Brown (2003) in the field of finance and accounting. Polonsky, Jones, and Kearsley (1999) advocate a similar approach using university library holdings. The advantages are that it is demand-driven and permits analysis at a micro or individual paper level.…”
Section: Downloads From Websites or Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been used recently by Ryan (2005) in an indicative study of tourism journals and has also been advocated by Brown (2003) in the field of finance and accounting. Polonsky, Jones, and Kearsley (1999) advocate a similar approach using university library holdings. The advantages are that it is demand-driven and permits analysis at a micro or individual paper level.…”
Section: Downloads From Websites or Librariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baumgartner and Pieters (2003) have suggested that single-item perceptual rankings have the benefit of capturing complex individual information, but others have suggested that rankings based on single-item measures may be limited in scope (Hult, Neese, and Bashaw 1997;Polonsky, Jones, and Kearsley 1999;Shugan 2003). Some of the single-item criteria that have been used include number of citations to a journal or author (Cheng, Chan, and Chan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria of material used purely relied on accessibility to documents that relates to the subject matter (Polonsky, Jones and Kearsley 1999). We tried to identify scholarly quotes and literate proves in journals, conference papers and text books on how socio economic activities in Nigeria affects happiness in one way or the other.…”
Section: Methods Employedmentioning
confidence: 99%