Rhetorical Accessability: At the Intersection of Technical Communication and Disability Studies 2013
DOI: 10.2190/raac7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility Challenges for Visually Impaired Students and Their Online Writing Instructors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study answers calls in business communication for more theoretical knowledge of interpersonal communication (DeKay, 2012;Hynes, 2012;Robles, 2012) by demonstrating how ableist assumptions about work are often implicitly reinforced in interpersonal communication. While critical technical and professional communication scholars have utilized disability studies to rhetorically examine and teach ableist constructions of technical and professional texts and pedagogies (Larkin, 2013;Meloncon, 2013;Oswal & Hewett, 2013;Oswal & Meloncon, 2014;Palmeri, 2006;Pass, 2013;Walters, 2010;Wilson, 2000), findings from this study suggest that technical and professional communication students and practitioners need to learn how to critically examine and reimagine widely accepted, defining features of work and working bodies in order to promote accessibility in workplaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This study answers calls in business communication for more theoretical knowledge of interpersonal communication (DeKay, 2012;Hynes, 2012;Robles, 2012) by demonstrating how ableist assumptions about work are often implicitly reinforced in interpersonal communication. While critical technical and professional communication scholars have utilized disability studies to rhetorically examine and teach ableist constructions of technical and professional texts and pedagogies (Larkin, 2013;Meloncon, 2013;Oswal & Hewett, 2013;Oswal & Meloncon, 2014;Palmeri, 2006;Pass, 2013;Walters, 2010;Wilson, 2000), findings from this study suggest that technical and professional communication students and practitioners need to learn how to critically examine and reimagine widely accepted, defining features of work and working bodies in order to promote accessibility in workplaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To expand on professional communicators’ understanding of accessible design, this article advocates grounding discussions of accessibility and usability in disability studies. Moreover, though I recognize accessible classrooms are also legally protected and we should strive to ensure our classrooms are accessible (Armstrong, 2009; Case & Davidson, 2011; Coombs, 2010; Nielsen, 2013, 2016; Oswal & Hewett, 2013), this article’s focus is to prepare students to create these accessible documents.…”
Section: The Disability Gap In Professional Communication Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, disability studies approaches have been so far absent from business communication research and scholarship of pedagogy. To show the relevance of disability studies to business and professional communication, I draw from the related discipline of technical communication (Colton & Walton, 2015; Elmore, 2013; Gutsell & Hulgin, 2013; Jarrett, Redish, & Summers, 2013; Meloncon, 2013; Oswal, 2014; Oswal & Hewett, 2013; Palmeri, 2006; Walters, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scholarship picks up Palmeri's initiative to address issues of disability and accessibility, promoting concrete practices to teach undergraduates (Pass, 2013;Youngblood, 2013) and instructors (Oswal & Hewett, 2013) about the important legal and ethical ramifications of ableist approaches to design. Reporting a national survey about online writing instruction, Oswal and Meloncon (2014) encouraged scholars and teachers in TPC to "think about how power and privilege could impede accessibility and accommodation" (p. 273).…”
Section: Disability and Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%