2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility Evaluation of E-Government Mobile Applications in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
40
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Most Popular Automated Accessibility Tools and Applicable StandardsKang, 2015;Shi, 2006;Serra, Carvalho, Ferreira, Vaz, and Friere, 2015).Several studies have evaluated web accessibility of higher learning institutions. Using HERA and WAVE as the assessment tools,Adepoju and Shehu (2014) reported substantial incompliance of 36 Nigerian federal universities' websites on accessibility guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most Popular Automated Accessibility Tools and Applicable StandardsKang, 2015;Shi, 2006;Serra, Carvalho, Ferreira, Vaz, and Friere, 2015).Several studies have evaluated web accessibility of higher learning institutions. Using HERA and WAVE as the assessment tools,Adepoju and Shehu (2014) reported substantial incompliance of 36 Nigerian federal universities' websites on accessibility guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discuss the methodological adaptations of the 61 success criteria of WCAG 2.0 for the context of mobile applications for Android and IOS pointing its current limitations. The results showed that many elementary accessibility problems, such as colour contrast and navigationrelated were extensively found in all applications evaluated [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Serra et al [6] did some researches on the use of the mobile application for developing m-government, an application for providing services for citizens. By using mgovernment, services were more accessible to the citizens, including disabled people.…”
Section: Iclbi (2018)mentioning
confidence: 99%