2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility governs the relative reactivity of basic residues in formaldehyde-induced protein modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…vent-accessible lysine residues have been found to provide the most reactive functional groups in native proteins, and moreover, modification of native proteins by formaldehyde does not appear to perturb tertiary structure very much (20). This is consistent with early work in the chromatin field that established that lysine residues are the predominant sites of formation of methylene bridges in histone complexes; such studies led to the suggestion as well that formaldehyde crosslinking does not in general perturb protein structure (21).…”
Section: Formaldehyde Reactivity With Proteinssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…vent-accessible lysine residues have been found to provide the most reactive functional groups in native proteins, and moreover, modification of native proteins by formaldehyde does not appear to perturb tertiary structure very much (20). This is consistent with early work in the chromatin field that established that lysine residues are the predominant sites of formation of methylene bridges in histone complexes; such studies led to the suggestion as well that formaldehyde crosslinking does not in general perturb protein structure (21).…”
Section: Formaldehyde Reactivity With Proteinssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…4a, when formaldehyde treated and untreated myoglobin samples were unfolded by decreasing the pH, both samples experienced similar increases in charge states, i.e. unfolding, irrespective of formaldehyde treatment [54]. This agrees with the previously mentioned dimethyl labeling experiments reporting that formaldehyde modification maintained the charge state of proteins and peptides [17].…”
Section: Formaldehyde Modification: Model Protein and Peptide Ms Studsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast, under reaction conditions derived for specific in vivo cross-linking in protein interaction studies (physiological pH buffer, 1% formaldehyde concentration and 5-20 min incubation time), only the N-terminus and cysteine, lysine, and to a lesser extent, arginine side chains, were primary reactive sites in the formaldehyde modification reaction [51,54].…”
Section: Formaldehyde Modification: Model Protein and Peptide Ms Studmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, studies using varying incubation times with formaldehyde have shown that in addition to the N-termini, lysine, tryptophan, and cysteine become modified first in model peptides [13]. Furthermore, it has been found for model proteins that, mainly, lysines were readily modified and therefore are assumed to be involved in the cross-linking reaction [14]. This assumption can be supported by observations from experiments using dimethylation labelling, which also involves reaction with formaldehyde in a first step and in which the modification is almost exclusively detected on lysines [15].…”
Section: Chemistry Of Formaldehyde Cross-linkingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is assumed that formaldehyde "fixes" and preserves protein structures, but it is possible formaldehyde treatment alters protein structures in some way. Two studies have addressed the effect of formaldehyde on the secondary and tertiary structure of model proteins, but neither was able to detect any effect of the modifications on the protein structure [14,17]. Thus, until further information is available, the effect of formaldehyde on protein structure can be assumed to be negligible.…”
Section: Chemistry Of Formaldehyde Cross-linkingmentioning
confidence: 98%