Accessibility of medical and psychosocial services following disasters and other traumatic events: experiences of Deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals in Denmark

Abstract

This study has identified significant gaps in post-disaster service provision for D/HH individuals. Results can inform policy makers and other authorities in the position to enhance existing services and/or develop new services for this vulnerable target population. Implications for Rehabilitation Being Deaf or hard-of-hearing compromises a person's ability to obtain and share vital information during times of disaster. Medical and psychosocial services are expected to play critical response roles in times of disaster, and, should be properly equipped to assist Deaf and hard-of-hearing (D/HH) individuals. In a relatively small sample, this study highlights barriers faced by D/HH individuals in Denmark when accessing first response, healthcare, and psychosocial services following large-scale disasters and individual traumatic events, all of which centered on communication problems and resulted in suboptimal care. Regarding rehabilitation after disasters, evidence-based information about how to service the heterogeneous communication needs of D/HH populations should be disseminated to professionals, and preferably incorporated into training programs.

A Facebook Page Created Soon After the Amatrice Earthquake for Deaf Adults and Children, Families, and Caregivers Provides an Easy Communication Tool and Social Satisfaction in Maxi-Emergencies

“…Generally, operators and practitioners tend to rely on the relatives of people with disabilities to disseminate specific information. 5 Additionally, natural disasters lead to a state of poverty. Hence, people with disabilities, regardless of their health status and caregiver assistance, need free access to prolonged tailored services.…”

Developing Signs of Safety: A Deaf‐accessible counselling toolkit for trauma and addiction

“…Given that most Deaf clients who enter behavioural health treatment have trauma histories and at least 74% of Deaf individuals in SUD treatment have experienced abuse (Titus et al, 2008), implementing integrated trauma/SUD interventions for this population is a logical first step to address Deaf behavioural health disparities in the United States. However, currently available evidence-based psychotherapies were designed for hearing populations and therefore fail to meet the unique linguistic, developmental, and cultural needs of Deaf clients (Anderson et al, 2017b;Estrada & Beyebach, 2007;Fellinger & Fellinger, 2014;Glickman & Pollard, 2013;Kuenburg et al, 2016;Skot et al, 2017). Most combine traditional talk therapy with client workbooks or handouts, which often contain sophisticated strategies for tracking mood, behaviour, and thoughts, and use psychological jargon throughout.…”

Public Open Spaces: Enabling or Impeding Inclusive Evacuation during Disasters

“…The lack of universal design and accessibility are not the only factors that increase the disaster risk for persons with disabilities; cultural attitudes, stigma and barriers to their full participation in society have the same impact. This was shown in a UN survey conducted in 126 countries, which found that only 14 per cent of people with disabilities had been consulted about disaster risk management in their communities, implying that their risk reduction needs have been ignored (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2013; Hunt et al, 2015;Nunnerley et al, 2015;Stough and Kang, 2015;Skøt et al, 2016). This is particularly worrying given that, as a result of climate change, the number of disasters is expected to increase over the next few years (United Nations Refugee Agency, 2017), and therefore the disaster needs of older people and persons with disabilities should be urgently addressed.…”