Accessibility of web‐based library databases: the vendors' perspectives in 2007

Abstract

PurposeWeb‐based research databases are common in today's libraries, but most librarians lack the ability to evaluate them for accessibility for persons with disabilities. Consequently, they rely upon resource providers to develop products that are ADA and Section 508 compliant. Are database vendors stepping up to the plate? As a follow‐up to a study reported in 2003, the purpose of this paper is to investigate accessibility of online databases from database vendors' perspectives.Design/methodology/approachResearchers used a web‐based questionnaire to gather information from vendors of online databases concerning the accessibility of their products. The questions covered general information about product accessibility, compliance with Section 508 standards, and product accessibility/usability testing.FindingsNearly all of the companies who participated in the survey consider their products to be mostly accessible to users of assistive technologies and are committed to improving product accessibility in the future. At the same time, few companies promote accessibility in their marketing efforts. Most companies test their products for accessibility, but few conduct usability tests with actual persons with disabilities.Research limitations/implicationsThis study covered a small sample of database vendors and relied on self‐reporting by representatives from database companies. Until usability testing becomes a standard practice, product testing by independent parties is necessary to complete the accessibility report cards for online library database providers.Practical implicationsLibrarians must be proactive in encouraging vendors to continue to provide products that are accessible and user‐friendly for everybody including persons with disabilities.Originality/valueThis is the second known study that examines online database accessibility and usability based on database vendors' perspectives.

Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities

“…The three databases selected represented three different vendors (ProQuest, CSA and Gale, respectively) of electronic resources commonly used by students at both universities. The vendors' perspectives study by Byerley et al (2007) indicated that EBSCO was a proactive vendor in terms of product accessibility and therefore was not selected for this study. The order of databases searched alternated with each participant.…”

Do You Hear What I See? Assessing Accessibility of Digital Commons and CONTENTdm

“…A number of studies investigate the accessibility and usability of these online resources for people using assistive technologies. All of these indicate that while most indexes and databases are now largely compliant with common accessibility standards and permit the performance of common search tasks, their actual user friendliness for people with disabilities tends to be low (Byerley, Chambers, & Thohira, 2007;Riley, 2002;Stewart et al, 2006). Other studies build on the accessibility evaluation process and provide best practices for enhancing access to electronic resources (Tatomir & Durance, 2010;Tatomir & Tatomir, 2012).…”

Still up in the air

“…A 2007 survey of corporations found that a vast majority do not conduct accessibility tests of their sites with users with disabilities, while those with accessible sites rarely promote such accessibility in marketing efforts [2]. Collectively, the findings from all of these studies demonstrate that most corporations have not "sufficiently recognized the importance of customers with disabilities to their business goals" [21].…”