2017
DOI: 10.5463/dcid.v28i3.642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility to Power: Framing of the Disability Rights Movements in India and Nepal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many people with disabilities in India experience poverty due to barriers to accessing education and employment. The Indian disability rights movement continues to push for the realisation of disability rights and positive change (although there has been some criticism that the movement is dominated by the urban middle classes) (Schedin 2017).…”
Section: Disability Experience In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many people with disabilities in India experience poverty due to barriers to accessing education and employment. The Indian disability rights movement continues to push for the realisation of disability rights and positive change (although there has been some criticism that the movement is dominated by the urban middle classes) (Schedin 2017).…”
Section: Disability Experience In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, field-specific conditions and frameworks seem to matter in many ways (Diani, 2019;Fligstein and McAdam, 2011;Lahusen et al, 2020;London and Schneider, 2012;Schedin, 2017). Overall, our study paints a complex picture of the interplay between the various factors underlying TSOs' solidarity conceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…poverty, financial and food security, experiences of violence) [28,52,53]. Research from India and Nepal found that the focus on human rights advocacy by national-level (elite) disability activists did not reflect the concern for basic needs expressed by people with disabilities at subnational levels [54]. Interest in participation is also likely to be influenced by service use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%