2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2015.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing Genetic Information with Liquid Biopsies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These duplicates were filtered out during the bioinformatics analysis pipeline, but it cannot be excluded that some identical reads not corresponding to PCR duplicates are also falsely removed. Thus, this protocol could be further improved using a UMI (unique molecular identifiers) prior to library construction to separate real PCR duplicates from alignment duplicates (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These duplicates were filtered out during the bioinformatics analysis pipeline, but it cannot be excluded that some identical reads not corresponding to PCR duplicates are also falsely removed. Thus, this protocol could be further improved using a UMI (unique molecular identifiers) prior to library construction to separate real PCR duplicates from alignment duplicates (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in serum (Liu et al, 2011). Molecular 'liquid biopsies' are quickly moving into the clinic, creating a new palette of molecular diagnostics and becoming a central piece in the future of platform technology for precision medicine (Cai et al, 2015). Circulating biodosimetry markers collected from liquid biopsies are especially helpful to assess the dose of absorbed radiation in the case of an accidental exposure to IR requiring fast and efficient triage for guiding medical countermeasures.…”
Section: Ionizing Radiation Increases Mir-34a Expressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid development of highly sensitive and accurate technologies of NGS, it can not only predict the response to treatment, but also monitor minimal residual disease [69,70]. As an example, FGFR2 fusion in ctDNA was readily detectable by quantitative realtime reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and corroborated to be more sensitive and specific than previous biomarkers, such as CA125 [71].…”
Section: Perspectivementioning
confidence: 98%