2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-011-9178-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accountability conversations: mathematics teachers’ learning through challenge and solidarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…• The fostering of a teacher's engagement, within the communities, characterised by challenge, solidarity and accountability (Brodie and Shalem 2011), but also trust and respect (Dawson 2008). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The fostering of a teacher's engagement, within the communities, characterised by challenge, solidarity and accountability (Brodie and Shalem 2011), but also trust and respect (Dawson 2008). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graven and Venkat 2014;Khuzwayo and Mashiya 2015;Molefe and Brodie 2010;Webb 2015). If we add PLC research, together with alternative non-formalised programme designs such as lesson study, cluster programmes and communities of practice, research (e.g., Brodie 2007Brodie , 2013Brodie and Shalem 2011;Posthuma 2012;Pausigere and Graven 2014;Singh 2011;Ono and Fereira 2010) to formalised TPL programme design, we see that these two closely related themes combine to make 25% of the research output. This is understandable in the context of a research community seeking more sustainable models of teacher professional development and learning.…”
Section: Main Research Themesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Based on these activities teachers identify a key concept that underlies a number of learner errors. They then read and discuss research on learners' thinking in those concepts (Molefe, Brodie, Sapire, & Shalem 2010), design lessons to engage with learners' thinking, and then videotape and reflect on those lessons (Brodie, 2011;Brodie & Shalem 2011). In the current phase of the project, DIPIP Phase 3 (2011-2012), we are working in schools with mathematics departments, using the activities to build the departments' collective engagement with data from their schools, and their design of and reflection on lessons based on their data analysis.…”
Section: The Data Informed Practice Improvement Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%