2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting-based versus market-based cross-sectional models of CDS spreads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
65
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ericsson et al (2009) show that much of the variation in CDS spreads can be explained by structural model factors linked to firm fundamentals. Callen et al (2009) and Das et al (2009) find that accounting earnings are priced into the levels of and changes in CDS spreads, whereas De Franco et al (2009) show that CDS prices are responsive to debt analysts' reports. Shivakumar et al (2011) demonstrate that CDS pricing reacts significantly to management forecast news and that the reaction to forecast news is stronger than to actual earnings news.…”
Section: The Cds Market and Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ericsson et al (2009) show that much of the variation in CDS spreads can be explained by structural model factors linked to firm fundamentals. Callen et al (2009) and Das et al (2009) find that accounting earnings are priced into the levels of and changes in CDS spreads, whereas De Franco et al (2009) show that CDS prices are responsive to debt analysts' reports. Shivakumar et al (2011) demonstrate that CDS pricing reacts significantly to management forecast news and that the reaction to forecast news is stronger than to actual earnings news.…”
Section: The Cds Market and Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies demonstrate that financial information (such as earnings) significantly affects CDS pricing (Das et al 2009;Callen et al 2009). We extend this line of research by providing evidence that CDS pricing is influenced by financial information risk proxied by the quality of internal control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each firm-quarter observation, we collect different issuer-specific variables from CRSP and COMPUSTAT (chosen variables are along the lines of Das, Hanouna and Sarin (2009)). We drop all firm-quarter observations post CDS-introduction; that is, if CDS has been introduced for a firm prior to a given quarter, we drop that firm-quarter from the analysis (since CDS introduction is no longer a choice decision for these firms).…”
Section: Controlling For Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, no study in the related literature has used specifically balance sheet variables to explain variation in CDS spreads. Most empirical papers (see for example Collin-Dufresne et al, 2001;Bystrom, 2005;Zhang et al, 2005;Duffie et al, 2007;Das et al, 2008) investigating the explanatory power of credit risk variables for bond and CDS include in the model several variables to proxy for business conditions, market conditions and/or uncertainty (term structure of interest rates, market return, market volatility, etc.). We are conscious of the influence market variables have on CDS spreads, however in this paper, because of the time period considered, we decided to focus only on the correlation between balance sheet ratios and CDS spreads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%