2015
DOI: 10.2308/jiar-51335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for Biological Assets and the Cost of Debt

Abstract: Firms engaged in agriculture generate revenue from biological assets that manifest in the cultivation of bearer fruits and nuts, the tilling of crops, and the production of livestock and forestry. We investigate whether firms' cost of debt is associated with the measurement method they use to account for their biological assets. We find that the cost of debt is higher for firms using the fair value method of accounting for their biological assets relative to firms using historical cost. However, the positive a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
36
1
10

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
36
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Measuring the value of biological assets in the context of third party capital cost was an issue studied by Daly and Skaife (2016). They state that ' .…”
Section: Understanding the Cost Of Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the value of biological assets in the context of third party capital cost was an issue studied by Daly and Skaife (2016). They state that ' .…”
Section: Understanding the Cost Of Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest rates of the firms were not directly reported in the financial statements collected in this study. Thus, the cost of debt was estimated based on the studies of Pittman and Fortin (2004), Minnis (2011) and Daly and Skaife (2016), in which it was obtained by dividing the reported interest expenditures by the average of short-and long-term debt [(short-term debt + long-term debt) / 2].…”
Section: Variable Description ■ Dependent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the cost of debt paid by firms is not directly observable. As a result, the cost of debt was estimated based on the studies of Pittman and Fortin (2004), Minnis (2011) and Daly and Skaife (2016), in which the estimate was obtained by dividing the interest expenditures reported by the average of short-and longterm debt. However, despite its wide use in the literature, this measure is a noisy proxy for the interest rate in private companies, and Cassar (2011) identifies several limitations of this proxy, such as the fact that it considers the average level of debt instead of the loan characteristics and does not identify which liabilities are at arms' length.…”
Section: Robustness Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…of the Previous Research and Publications. Issues of evaluation of biological assets and agricultural products have attracted a large number of foreign scholars in recent years (among them there are scientists from Italy (R.Cavaliero [1], Romania (D.Mates, V.Grosu [2]), England (A.Further[3] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%