2016
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for directionality as a function of structural typology in performance‐based earthquake engineering design

Abstract: For the seismic design of a structure, horizontal ground shaking is usually considered in two perpendicular directions, even though real horizontal ground motions are complex two-dimensional phenomena that impose different demands at different orientations. While the issue of ground motion dependence on the orientation of the recording devices has been the focus of many significant developments during the last decade, the effects of directionality on the characteristics of the structure have received less atte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Having worked within the context of the NGA‐West2 research programme, coordinated by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Shahi and Baker use S a R o t D 50 ( T ), while the present work is built upon S a R o t D 100 ( T ) instead. S a R o t D 100 ( T ) is preferred herein for two reasons: firstly, because it is relevant for azimuth‐independent structures (e.g., Grant, Stewart et al, and Nievas and Sullivan()) and secondly, because its relation with the spectral demand at other orientations appears more intuitive. As S a R o t D 100 ( T ) is the largest demand at all possible orientations, the ratio S a ( T , θ )/ S a R o t D 100 ( T ) can only lie in the range [0.0,1.0] and has a lower bound at each angle θ equal to false|cosfalse(θfalse)false|.…”
Section: Relation With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Having worked within the context of the NGA‐West2 research programme, coordinated by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Shahi and Baker use S a R o t D 50 ( T ), while the present work is built upon S a R o t D 100 ( T ) instead. S a R o t D 100 ( T ) is preferred herein for two reasons: firstly, because it is relevant for azimuth‐independent structures (e.g., Grant, Stewart et al, and Nievas and Sullivan()) and secondly, because its relation with the spectral demand at other orientations appears more intuitive. As S a R o t D 100 ( T ) is the largest demand at all possible orientations, the ratio S a ( T , θ )/ S a R o t D 100 ( T ) can only lie in the range [0.0,1.0] and has a lower bound at each angle θ equal to false|cosfalse(θfalse)false|.…”
Section: Relation With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having worked within the context of the NGA-West2 research programme, 21 coordinated by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Shahi and Baker 8 use Sa RotD50 (T), while the present work is built upon Sa RotD100 (T) instead. Sa RotD100 (T) is preferred herein for two reasons: firstly, because it is relevant for azimuth-independent structures (e.g., Grant, Stewart et al, and Nievas and Sullivan 1,7,9 ) and secondly, because its relation with the spectral demand…”
Section: Relation With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations