2018
DOI: 10.1101/249722
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for Errors in Low Coverage High-Throughput Sequencing Data when Constructing Genetic Maps using Biparental Outcrossed Populations

Abstract: Next generation sequencing is an efficient method that allows for substantially more markers than previous technologies, providing opportunities for building high density genetic linkage maps, which facilitate the development of non-model species’ genomic assemblies and the investigation of their genes. However, constructing genetic maps using data generated via high-throughput sequencing technology (e.g., genotyping-by-sequencing) is complicated by the presence of sequencing errors and genotyping errors resul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 C) the resulting map is considerably large. Two main reasons for this inflation are misplacement of closely linked SNPs and genotyping errors 14,2931 , which will be systematically addressed in the next sections. The alignment of the “de novo” map against the reference genomes is shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 C) the resulting map is considerably large. Two main reasons for this inflation are misplacement of closely linked SNPs and genotyping errors 14,2931 , which will be systematically addressed in the next sections. The alignment of the “de novo” map against the reference genomes is shown in Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been used in diploid mapping populations (Fragoso et al, 2015;Bilton et al, 2018) and can be extended to the HMMs developed for SNP array data in tetraploids (Hackett et al, 2013;Zheng et al, 2016). For unordered markers, alternative imputation methods need to be explored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises issues with potentially erroneous variant calling due to sequence errors and/or heterozygous sites being called as homozygous due to sequencing of just one allele (Bilton et al . ). Harnessing pedigree information together with imputation approaches within a breeding programme may be an effective route for improving the quality of low‐coverage WGS data and may have downstream benefits for genomic prediction accuracy (Hickey ).…”
Section: State Of the Art And Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 97%